HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

A third of female employees were deemed ‘a distraction’ to male colleagues at work

-

A new study has revealed that one in four British women have been warned about their appearance in the workplace,compared to just one in nine men. Alarmingly, a third of women pulled up on their appearance at work were deemed ‘a distraction’ to their male colleagues.

Wearing too much makeup and not being clean or neatly shaven are the top reasons that Britons get called out by their managers at work for their appearance – with women being called out more often than men.

The research was carried out by Voucher Codes Pro as part of an ongoing study into British expenses on their appearance. 2,384 Britons aged 18 and over, all of whom stated that they were in full-time employment, were quizzed about their appearance and how it differed at home and in the workplace. There were an equal number of male and female respondents.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Initially, all respondents were asked ‘What’s the dress code in your workplace?’ to which the top responses were ‘formal’ (34 per cent), ‘a set uniform’ (29 per cent) and ‘smart casual’ (27 per cent). All respondents were then asked if they had ever been spoken to by management about their appearance, to which one quarter of the female respondents said they had been, compared to just nine per cent of British men.

All female respondents were asked why they had been pulled up by their management on their appearance. When provided with a list of possible reasons why and told to select all that applied, 46 per cent said wearing too much make up, 35 per cent said wearing a skirt that is too short, 30 per cent said wearing a top that was deemed too revealing and 15 per cent said being ‘over the top’ or flamboyant with outfit choice.

A third of female respondents called up on their appearance (35 per cent) stated that a key part of them being spoken to was because they were deemed ‘a distraction’ to their male counterparts.

Similarly, all male respondents were asked to state why they’d been pulled up on their appearance by management.

56 per cent said not being clean or neatly shaven, 34 per cent said incorrect footwear i.e trainers instead of shoes, 32 per cent wearing shorts instead of trousers and 19 per cent said being ‘over the top’ or flamboyant with outfit choice.

All respondents were then asked how they’d been left feeling after being pulled up on their appearance. Female respondents admitted that they were left feeling ‘embarrassed’ (33 per cent), ‘angry’ (30 per cent) and ‘singled out’ (25 per cent), whereas the majority of male respondents admitted that they ‘shrugged it off’ (72 per cent).

According to the poll, almost three quarters of female respondents (73 per cent) called out on their appearance admitted that they adhered to the warnings and made changes to their appearance, whereas just 44 per cent of male respondents did the same.

George Charles, spokesperson for Voucher Codes Pro, commented on the findings:

“It’s OK to pull up a member of your staff on their appearance if you genuinely believe that they’re breaking their contract in anyway, or even if it poses some sort of health & safety risk, but you just can’t tell women to change their appearance because they’re possibly going to be distracting to their male colleagues. That’s outrageous.

“It’s definitely interesting that women felt singled out, angry and embarrassed, and went on to make changes to their appearance so as not to be called out again, yet most men didn’t care too much about the warning they received and didn’t make changes anyway. It’s definitely food for thought, but it can’t be one rule for one and another for someone else; be consistent.”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Andrew Lawton: Home working leaves employees and their employers vulnerable

In case we needed any further proof that remote working is now a permanent fixture of modern life, recent data from the Office for National Statistics provided it, says Andrew Lawton.

Nigel Watson: Shares for rights – A diamond in disguise

New law As of 1 September 2013, a new employment...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you