Six in ten employers in favour of new National Living Wage

-

Payslip300

Six in ten employers are in favour of the new National Living Wage, according to new research from Group Risk Development (GRiD), the trade body for the group risk industry.

While the introduction of a new mandatory National Living Wage of £7.20 an hour from April 2016 has had some businesses concerned about the overall impact on their bottom line, 62 percent said they were in favour of the proposal, with one in five (21 percent) saying they disagreed.

With speculation over how the government will seek to soften the blow on cuts to tax credits for the lowest earners, the most popular proposal – with 82 percent of employers in favour – is a rise in the personal allowance to £11,000 in 2016/17, meaning households will be better supported in the long-run.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“From these findings, employers are clearly putting staff first when it comes to welfare and consideration of income. Yes, there has been widespread concern and calls to cast the new Living Wage aside for the sake of the bottom line but, on the ground, businesses are thinking longer-term when it comes to employee support,” commented Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for Group Risk Development (GRiD).

Cuts to the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), which will hit claimants in the Work-Related Activity Group from April 2017 provoke a more divisive response among employers, with 39 percent voting in favour and 32 percent disagreeing. The policy which, in current terms, would involve a cut of around £30 per week in benefits, means that many new ESA claimants will receive the same (lower) amount as claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA).

When it comes to protecting the health and welfare of employees, however, two in five (41 percent) of businesses think employers have a greater role to play in driving this forward, but that the government should incentivise them more.

“If there are concerns about how an increase in wages will be a drain on profitability, the important thing is to look at how a business can increase productivity. This really does start with the people, and the key is to look at ways of improving staff morale – whether this is through flexible working, focusing on fitness, financial education or other means. The fact is, a contented and focused workforce will drive the business forward, and a change in salary should not be seen as a pull on that,” Moxham concluded.

Robert joined the HRreview editorial team in October 2015. After graduating from the University of Salford in 2009 with a BA in Politics, Robert has spent several years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past he has been part of editorial teams at Flux Magazine, Mondo*Arc Magazine and The Marine Professional.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Venetia Leigh: Rising childcare costs: Why employers must step into the conversation

The emotional and financial demands of raising children often leaves parents feeling as though they’re perpetually spinning plates...

Jo Matkin: Man vs machine: the impact of technology on HR and the workplace

With technology developing at a constant rate, it’s inevitable that the way people work and are managed will change in the years to come. Boston Consulting Group recently estimated that, by 2025, up to a quarter of jobs will be replaced by either smart software or robots. As well as impacting the wider workforce, this is bound to have a significant effect on HR and resourcing functions.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you