Employers must invest in productivity to cope with National Living Wage, warns CIPD

-

TeamThe UK’s poor productivity in recent years could be due to the attitudes of its businesses in relation to investment, new research from the CIPD suggests.

The report from the professional body for HR and people development revealed that, despite two years of growth, a fifth (21%) of companies are still stuck in survival mode and aren’t making the necessary investments in people or equipment that would boost their productivity.

Mark Beaston, the CIPD’s chief economist, is calling for businesses to break through the ‘ambition ceiling’ that is preventing their growth. He said:

“The recession has cast a long shadow over many British businesses and residual fears about a future downturn have left many organisations with a ‘glass half empty’ mindset, which has held them back from investing, despite improved economic conditions.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“We need these businesses to recognise the current opportunities for growth, innovation and investment, to raise their sights and break through their ‘ambition ceiling’. Unless they can do this, it’s questionable how many companies will be able to absorb the planned National Living Wage without an adverse impact on employment levels.”

The CIPD’s report, Investing in Productivity, found a clear link between an organisation’s mindset and its relative productivity. It breaks down the nearly 1,000 organisations surveyed into five distinct mindsets based on respondents’ experience over the last two years.

Balanced investors – A quarter (25%) said that they have ‘continued to invest in equipment, technology and people and have increased their productivity significantly’ over the last two years. This group is most likely to have increased investment on the previous two years. Over half (53%) have increased expenditure on capital equipment, 43 percent increased expenditure on learning and development (L&D) and 72 percent had increased their output in the previous 12 months.

Survivors – 21 percent of organisations felt that their business had been ‘in survival mode for a long time and had not been able to invest in major improvements to the business’. This group is most likely to have reduced investment in the previous two years – 22 percent reduced expenditure on capital equipment and 30% reduced expenditure on L&D.

Cost cutters – 19 percent said that they are ‘a leaner business now because they took cost out during the recession and the productivity of their workers has improved as a result’. This group is most likely to have maintained a stable level of investment.

People-focused investors – 16 percent said that their business ‘has continued to invest in its people, but they need to invest more in equipment and technology to see real productivity improvements’.

Capital-focused investors – 13% said that their business has’ continued to invest in equipment and technology but they haven’t invested enough in staff to maximise the value of this investment’.

When asked about their future plans and productivity potential:

  • 55 percent of organisations expect to produce more goods and services in the coming year, 32 percent expect to produce the same and eight percent expect to produce less.
  • 34 percent of organisations consider themselves high performers that don’t see the need for major change and lots of investment.
  • A further third (33 percent) fall into the category of intending to make up lost ground, with 17 percent saying that they will now be able to make the investments in equipment and technology they haven’t been able to do in the last few years’ and 16 percent saying that they will now be able to make the investments in people that they haven’t been able to in recent years.
  • However, a fifth (20 percent) thought they wouldn’t be in a position to improve existing poor performance because they lacked the finance to invest (reported by 16 percent) or the skills and ambition to improve (reported by four percent).

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Brian Kropp: Employee behaviour influenced by Brexit disruption

Many employers operate believing that their employees will loyally knuckle down during times of strife, in order to protect the business and their jobs. Far from it however, Brian Kopp argues.

Emma Hardaker-Jones: The importance of mental health role models in business

The impact of poor mental health on workplace wellbeing continues to be a significant problem for businesses.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you