What can HR learn from the United deplaning debacle?

-

United Airlines is facing a PR nightmare after a video emerged showing a passenger being forcibly removed from an ‘overbooked’ flight. While the debate rages on regarding passenger rights when an airline requests ‘volunteers’ to give up their seats, are there lessons that HR can learn from the incident?

In an internal email to staff, United CEO Oscar Munoz initially defended employees’ conduct, saying the passenger in question had been “disruptive and belligerent” and praising staff for going “above and beyond”.

Here, it can be argued that he failed to truly investigate and confirm the facts of the incident before deciding on a course of action.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This initial muted response, which did not include an apology, led to severe backlash across the globe, with the video of the injured passenger going viral on the news and social media.

The passenger was David Dao, a 69-year-old physician, who is now in hospital being treated for his injuries.

After Munoz’ early statement, he then retracted and has since issued several apologies to the press about the way the customer was treated. He told ABC News:

“He can’t be. He was a paying passenger sitting on our seat in our aircraft and no one should be treated that way. Period.”

He went on to blame the incident on ‘system failure’ and insufficient training from the United Airlines company:

It was a system failure. We have not provided our front line supervisors, managers and individuals with the proper tools, policies, procedures that allow them to use their common sense.

The airline has since reimbursed everyone on-board the flight for the price of their ticket and placed the officers who removed the passenger on administrative leave.

There are here two HR issues to consider. Should the internal emails, as private business documents, have been shared? Should companies back their employees unconditionally, regardless of the consequences, or do they need to be more aware?

Pam Rogerson is HR Director for the ELAS Group says:

“There is a lot to be said for supporting your employees when you TRULY believe they have been subjected to unacceptable behaviour. Just as employers are vicariously liable for the actions of their employees, companies are also at risk of claims from their employees in the event they are injured physically or emotionally during the course of their duties. This is maybe more apparent if, for example, you are working in front line services – police, fire, ambulance or hospitals. We have all heard accounts where nurses have been subjected to abusive behaviour and this is clearly not acceptable.

“It’s critical from an HR perspective to ensure that the investigatory process is followed to the letter whenever any kind of incident occurs, especially one as high profile as this. In these days of smart phones and social media anyone can become a so-called citizen journalist and, whereas previously companies might have been able to keep more control over coverage following an incident, it’s now more important than ever to ensure you establish all the facts before speaking publically. While no company wants to throw their employees under the proverbial bus, sometimes it is better to acknowledge mistakes, apologise and fix the problem to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

“Internal emails are private business documents and, as such, should be classed as private and confidential. As we’ve seen before internal documents do get leaked and once the cat is out of the bag there is no way of putting it back in. Before putting anything in writing, companies should look at how it could be perceived should a leak occur. You will be liable from public opinion for what you write so, if in any doubt, don’t write it in the first place. In my opinion United could not have handled this incident any worse, and they will struggle to come back from the reputational fallout.”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

New Sainsbury’s dismissal reignites debate over shoplifting intervention policies

Supermarket safety policies are under scrutiny as more retail workers lose jobs after confronting suspected thieves.

Cheryl-Anne Cooper: How human-led guest services drive employee wellbeing

The way people feel in a workplace matters just as much as how it functions, and guest service teams deliver experiences that reflect a brand’s culture and values.

Workplace injuries hit 60,000 as safety gaps widen across UK

Workplace accident rates reveal steep regional and sector differences, with serious injuries and fatalities continuing in high-risk industries.

Civil service attendance row raises questions over remote work oversight

Concerns over hybrid working oversight grow after claims of low office attendance across parts of the civil service.
- Advertisement -

UK leads Europe on salary transparency as EU pay deadline approaches

UK job adverts remain more open about pay than those in other major European economies as new transparency rules approach across the EU.

From factory floor to HR leader at CEVA Logistics

An HR leader at CEVA Logistics reflects on career growth, commuting, learning, leadership and balancing work with life at home.

Must read

Catherine Trombley: Mamma Mia! The Role of Working Moms

Lest you think this is a posting about the...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you