Employers going above and beyond automatic enrolment pension duties

-

A new CIPD survey has found that over two thirds (68%) of employers have automatically enrolled eligible workers into a pension scheme and among these, many are contributing significantly more than is legally required to their employees’ pension pots. The survey from the professional body for HR and people development also found that almost half (46%) report that the proportion of eligible workers who so far have opted out from pension saving is less than 10%, which is less than originally forecast by DWP.

The CIPD’s report – Labour Market Outlook: Focus on Pension Auto-Enrolment 2014 -questioned 1,080 employers and found that:

  •  The average employer contribution to the pension schemes of newly enrolled workers is 5.6% of salary while the average employee contribution is 4.7%
  • Focussing on the private sector, the CIPD’s survey shows that the typical employer contribution is 4.5% and the average worker contribution is 3.9%
  • Currently, the legal minimum requirement is that employers and employees contribute 1% each
  • Overall, just 7.4% of those eligible workers who have been automatically put into a workplace pension scheme have chosen to leave it.
  • Among private sector firms the opt-out rate is slightly higher at 7.7%. By employer size, the opt-out rate is higher among large organisations (7.9%) than among small and medium-sized ones (5.9%)
  • Within England, Midlands-based organisations have achieved the lowest opt out rate (5.8%) while in the South the rate is higher (8%)
  • Accommodation, food service activities and arts, entertainment and recreation, information and communication, and administrative and support service activity firms report average opt-out rates higher than 10%.

Commenting on the findings, the CIPD’s Performance and Reward Adviser Charles Cotton said:

“So far, pension automatic enrolment has been a success. It’s been the wake-up call we needed to get the UK saving for the future. Employers are in many cases going above and beyond the requirements and the majority of workers have opted to stay in the scheme. However, in the coming months, we need to keep a close eye on the number of workers leaving the pension scheme and what can be done to encourage them to stay. We also need to explore ways that we can increase the amount of money going into saving for retirement. To do this, it’s essential that employees are encouraged to look at their employer’s pension contribution as well as their take home pay when thinking about their total earnings. This is particularly important at a time when many people are experiencing either wage freezes or subdued wage growth.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

While many businesses already have automatic enrolment in place, many thousands more have yet to enrol. Among those who report that they have yet to implement auto-enrolment (28% of those surveyed, mostly small and medium-sized employers), 48% anticipate that they will have to limit future pay growth to pay for it while 19% forecast reducing hiring or cutting jobs. Just 26% think that they will be able to simply absorb the new costs while 18% think that there will be no additional expense.

However, of those who have already gone through automatic enrolment, 22% report that there are no significant extra costs, while 38% report that they have been able to absorb the additional expense. By contrast, just 14% reduced or froze wage growth while 13% scaled back on hiring or reduced staff numbers in response to the reforms.

Cotton continues:

“It’s concerning that many micro, small and medium-sized employers think that they may have to cut or restrict salary growth or reduce hiring to pay for automatic enrolment. Our survey last year* found many organisations predicting negative consequences in terms of employment and pay due to the pension changes, and these do not appear to have materialised. To mitigate any possible negative consequences, firms need to plan in advance, look at the cost implications, examine the potential responses and evaluate which ones meet the needs of the business, its employees and workers.

The CIPD’s survey also suggests that employers are committed to ensuring that their pension schemes are fit for purpose after the initial enrolment period.

  • 70% of employers have already carried out, or are planning, a review to ensure the pension arrangements meet the new legal requirements
  • 57% have, or are planning to, review the way they communicate to employees about pensions
  • 57% have, or are planning to, review how HR, payroll and pension administration systems interact
  • 55% of employers have, or are planning to, review that their automatic pension scheme meets the needs of the workforce
  • 51% of employers have, or are planning to, check whether the pension arrangements support the business strategy of the organisation
  • 48% have, or are planning to, analyse how the new arrangements are aligned to organisational culture and values.

Cotton concludes:

“Auto-enrolment is just the start. For pension schemes to remain relevant to businesses and employees they must be regularly reviewed to ensure that the plans are performing and that employees appreciate and understand what is being done for them and why.”

Paul Gray is an entrepreneur and digital publisher who creates online publications focused on solving problems, delivering news, and providing platforms for informed comment and debate. He is associated with HRZone and has built businesses in the HR and professional publishing sector. His work emphasizes creating industry-specific content platforms.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Jon Ingham: Social media – the opportunities for HR

I’m going to start off my blogging at HR...

Lars Hyland: Overcoming the lack of HR alignment between learning, employee engagement and performance management

"To survive and thrive in an undeniably challenging world, we must better align our learning and HR functions to achieve sustained high performance in the workplace."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you