The Work Programme ”will not do enough”

-

A leading figure at a centre-right think tank has accused ministers of failing to grasp the scale of the unemployment crisis and claimed that government welfare reforms will not be sufficient to solve “huge structural problems” in the labour market.

Matthew Oakley, the head of economics and social policy at Policy Exchange, told a Westminster debate that the Work Programme will not do enough in the short term to address long-term worklessness and youth unemployment.

He said: “There are still huge structural problems in the UK labour market, and despite all of the talk from ministers I don’t think that any of them have the answers.

“The Work Programme is effective and will prove to be a good thing, but we need to actually be honest and sell the message that there is an awfully long way to go.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Oakley called for a longer-term policy approach to welfare that offers more personalised support for jobseekers, delivers on ministerial pledges to make work pay and incorporates conditionality measures to encourage self-improvement through learning and working.

Oakley said: “Despite what the coalition says, we don’t think that enough personalisation happens, and people on jobseekers’ allowance or income support have to wait for six months to get onto the Work Programme. That is a long time for people to become demoralised and demotivated.

“Instead let’s send them to a specialist service from day one. That will involve changing the Work Programme contracts and it is also going to entail joining up employment and skills agendas across Whitehall.”

Oakley also urged ministers to adopt incentives over sanctions to break the costly cycle of low skills and generational worklessness.

He added: “The sanction of ‘three strikes and you’re out’ is not helpful, and when you apply it you actually damage the lives of the dependents you are trying to help.”

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Laura Timms: Five practical steps to getting started with HR analytics

Whilst we count-down the days to Symposium's Mission Critical: HR Analytics Summit 2019, Laura Timms discusses how HR departments can become a strategic rather than administrative function through embracing HR Analytics.

Luke Menzies: Tougher-than-expected Gender Pay Gap enforcement

In all the commentary written on the Gender Pay Gap reporting (GPGR - not to be confused with GDPR) legislation, very little has touched on the consequences of an employer failing to comply with its duty to report and publish.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you