The Work Programme ”will not do enough”

-

A leading figure at a centre-right think tank has accused ministers of failing to grasp the scale of the unemployment crisis and claimed that government welfare reforms will not be sufficient to solve “huge structural problems” in the labour market.

Matthew Oakley, the head of economics and social policy at Policy Exchange, told a Westminster debate that the Work Programme will not do enough in the short term to address long-term worklessness and youth unemployment.

He said: “There are still huge structural problems in the UK labour market, and despite all of the talk from ministers I don’t think that any of them have the answers.

“The Work Programme is effective and will prove to be a good thing, but we need to actually be honest and sell the message that there is an awfully long way to go.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Oakley called for a longer-term policy approach to welfare that offers more personalised support for jobseekers, delivers on ministerial pledges to make work pay and incorporates conditionality measures to encourage self-improvement through learning and working.

Oakley said: “Despite what the coalition says, we don’t think that enough personalisation happens, and people on jobseekers’ allowance or income support have to wait for six months to get onto the Work Programme. That is a long time for people to become demoralised and demotivated.

“Instead let’s send them to a specialist service from day one. That will involve changing the Work Programme contracts and it is also going to entail joining up employment and skills agendas across Whitehall.”

Oakley also urged ministers to adopt incentives over sanctions to break the costly cycle of low skills and generational worklessness.

He added: “The sanction of ‘three strikes and you’re out’ is not helpful, and when you apply it you actually damage the lives of the dependents you are trying to help.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Nick Wilson: Employers’ focus must remain on safety

"Continuing to focus on safety means every business can operate with confidence, with reassured staff and happy customers."

Lucinda Bromfield: It’s a depressing situation – stress at work claims

Yet another survey has shown that employers don’t seem...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you