Jobseekers often ignored by welfare firms for being “too costly”

-

jobseekerNews published by the Guardian  has shown that welfare firms admit to focusing on job seekers that are more likely to generate a fee and are ready to work, ignoring vulnerable jobless clients that require more investment and that are considered as “too costly” to help.

The research into flagship coalition initiative, revealed that the quality of services offered to job seekers is being affected by the way the Work Programme was designed, in which companies are not paid until customers have been in work for two years, creating a huge financial stress that many providers have no option but to prioritise on “easy customers” that are more likely to generate a fee.

Despite concerns over the Work Programme, the government has announced plans to use a similar payment by results system as it prepares to introduce market reforms to the probation service.

In addition, the study revealed a widespread concern that the “payment by results” approach has been undermining ministers’ stated aim of getting “hard to reach” customers, such as those with disabilities, off benefits and into work.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The study is based on a series of interviews with welfare providers of all sizes, both private companies and charities and focus groups conducted by the Third Sector Research Centre at Birmingham University.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Bernard Marr: How data is changing the way we work

No industry is unaffected by the wave of change...

Angela Love: Alternative routes to the same destination

With predictions citing that up to half the workforce could be working remotely by 2020, are graduate schemes the way forward for the future? Angela Love from Active discusses.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you