HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Senior execs say it could take their company up to a year to replace them, if they left

-

shutterstock_134138183

Eighty percent of senior executives said that their company would not be able to replace them quickly if they left, according to a survey of 1,270 business leaders from around the world by IIC Partners.

Despite the fact that almost six in 10 respondents said their company had a succession plan in place, only one in five said their organization would be able to replace them immediately if they were to leave.

“The findings of this survey point to a gap in succession planning at many companies,” said Paul Dinte, chairman of IIC Partners. “It is one thing to have a written succession plan, but quite another to be prepared for the departure of a C-level executive.” Two-thirds of the survey respondents were C-suite executives.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

When asked if there was a succession plan in place for their position, the senior-level executives responded this way:

  • 31 percent said their company had a succession plan and could replace them within 12 months
  • 26 percent said their company had no succession plan and they did not speculate on how long it would take to replace them
  • 20 percent said their company had a succession plan and could replace them immediately
  • 16 percent said their company did not have a succession plan and it would take 1-3 years to replace them
  • 4 percent said their company had no succession plan and it would take more than three years to replace them

Companies that reported being least ready to replace a senior executive were not-for-profits (40 percent said it would take up to a year to replace them) and family-owned businesses (37 percent).

“No matter the location or the industry, there remains a gap in succession planning by many organizations,” Dinte said. “This oversight will likely be worsened with the continued exodus of Baby Boomers from the workplace, as well as the different relationship with work that many younger employees have.

“Gen-X employees tend to change jobs more frequently. As this generation moves into C-suite positions, corporate expectations for length of service may have to be adjusted.”

Companies from the following industries reported suffering the most when a senior executive departed unexpectedly:

  • Not-for-profits (68 percent said it caused some or considerable difficulty)
  • Pharmaceuticals (67 percent)
  • Professional Services (67 percent)

When asked what the most negative impact of an unforeseen executive departure was, the senior-level executives responded this way:

  • 38 percent said an unforeseen departure would have a negative impact on the current culture
  • 18 percent said it would lead to the loss or delay of a new product or service
  • 16 percent said it would lead to the departure of another executive
  • 14 percent said it would lead to loss of revenue
  • 13 percent said it would lead to negative publicity

Respondents at smaller organizations reported being the least affected by unforeseen departures, with 56 percent saying that they had no significant business impact. Family-owned businesses reported suffering the most, with 94 percent saying that there was a negative impact on their organisation.

“Not surprisingly, family-owned businesses experienced the most pain from an unexpected executive departure, most likely because of the intertwined personal relationships involved,” Dinte noted.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Peter Sewell: Top tips for SMEs that are going global

SMEs and start-ups are facing some serious challenges as they begin to go international far earlier in their development than ever before.

Tracy Stanton: Innovative hiring practices for in-demand roles

Tracy Stanton offers three innovative approaches organisations can adopt to enhance their hiring practices and meet the demands of this rapidly evolving job market.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you