72 days before a job is considered undesirable

-

Research carried out by UK Recruitment Company Randstad suggests that employers need to fill job vacancies within 72 working days before people assume that it is a job that nobody wants.

An online survey asked 2,000 members of the public:

“How many working days does a vacancy for a permanent job have to be open before it starts to look like a bad job that no-one wants?”

Looking at the findings, UK CEO of Randstad, Mark Bull, commented:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“The results show recruiting for a job vacancy is like selling your house. Leave it on the market too long and, for whatever reason, people start to think there is something wrong with it.

“With the current skills shortage, it’s not a good idea to hold out too long for a candidate: eventually that tactic will back-fire and become counter-productive. If you interview a good candidate, don’t wait too long before you offer them a job.”

The results varied slightly depending on where people lived with workers in London seemingly less concerned by the amount of weeks a position has been vacant, saying that they would not consider it to be a bad job until the vacancy had been open for 79 working days.

Whereas those in the north-east believe a vacancy open for 58 working days is perceived to be a job nobody wants.

In a separate survey of over 2,000 British employees working in businesses of all sizes, Randstad found that people feel they are working the equivalent of a six and a half day week in order to cope with increased workloads and reluctance from their employers to recruit additional staff.

Mark Bull said:

“It’s also worth noting that the UK’s employees already feel they are covering 30% more work than one person should be. If they’re cramming an extra one and a half days worth of work into a working week, they are going to find it extremely difficult to cover for vacant job posts, too.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Simon Ratcliffe: Changing the language around inclusion in the workplace

"It takes much more than one individual to cultivate a diverse and inclusive business, and so hiring in this way only mirrors our approach of deficit resolution by quotas."

Neville Henderson: Alternatives to zero-hours contracts for businesses

Here, Neville Henderson gives some tips for businesses to avoid the use of zero-hours contracts while still retaining workforce flexibility.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you