Training Budgets fall foul of cuts

-

61% of L&D Managers agree that the training budget is the first to be cut when times are tough

Bracknell, 14 Feb 2012: Six out of ten learning & development managers say that their training budget is one of the first to be cut when times are hard, according to a survey by KnowledgePool, the managed learning company.

104 L&D managers were asked about their perception of training within their organisation, 61% claim that cost cutting exercises during times of financial constraint hit the training budget hard and fast. However the solution to this, may well lie in their own hands; 79% agreed that the sector needed to improve the way training was evaluated, and that ROI in training could be improved.

Kevin Lovell, Learning Consultancy Director at KnowledgePool agrees. “Drastic L&D cuts are not the answer in these tough times,” he explains. “Training that is tightly aligned to business goals is much more important. It ensures that businesses are in good shape to weather current storms and take advantage of the recovery when it comes. One of the great challenges for L&D is how to take a business-oriented view of learning.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The problem, according to Lovell, is that it is much easier to see training as a cost rather than an investment; and cutting costs by improving efficiency or reducing waste is uncomfortable but defensible in the current climate.

However, the way savings are made often points to an underlying problem. “We know a great deal about what learning costs, but very little about its value to an organisation. Our approach to the evaluation of learning involves post-training analysis which is time consuming, costly and by the time you get the result, it’s too late”.

KnowledgePool’s Lovell suggests a more pro-active approach to assessing ROI.

“Our suggestion is that, rather than trying to assess the business benefit after the training, why not think about the likely business benefit before it takes place? It is quite possible to estimate the expected value of a learning activity at the planning stage – you do it by asking these sorts of questions:

* What business issues do you expect the training will resolve or diminish?
* What business improvements or behavioural changes are you expecting to see after the training, that you can’t see now?
* What past experiences make you think that the proposed learning will achieve these changes?

By asking these questions, you can quickly assess the business value of the proposed learning. Having done that, a number of possibilities open up:

* You can see how well your proposed learning aligns to the business strategy.
* You can estimate the return on investment (ROI) of the proposed learning.
* You can prioritise your learning according to the level of business impact.
* You can tell your business managers the impact of not doing whatever training doesn’t fit within the budget you’ve got.
* You can begin to argue for training budget on a commercial business basis, instead of saying ‘it’s really important’.

“The important thing is you’ll be talking to your business managers using commercial language they will understand,” says Lovell. “We are talking about estimates here, but our experience of analysing learning outcomes after the event shows that most outcomes (good and bad) are not unexpected and could have been anticipated at the outset.”

Managed learning companies like KnowledgePool help L&D managers educate the business on training that delivers results. In today’s tough economic climate it is even more important to focus training budget correctly and contribute to business growth through improving skills.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Melisaan Foster: The cost of disconnect — How misaligned HR and leadership fuels an engagement and wellbeing crisis

When there is misalignment between HR and leadership, employee engagement and wellbeing take a sharp downturn.

Anne-Marie Scott: How to maintain organisational cohesion during COVID-19

"Meaningful connections with staff will be vital in maintaining trust and solidarity during the pandemic."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you