Female council workers secure £50m victory after long-running equal pay dispute

-

Thousands of low-paid female workers at Glasgow City Council are set to share in a payout believed to be worth up to £50 million after a senior judge ruled in their favour in a long-running pay dispute.

The Court of Session ruled that women employees at Scotland’s largest council had been excluded from sizeable bonuses for many years and had been discriminated against for three years when they were trying to sort out equal pay claims.

Around 6,000 workers believed they had been discriminated against and launched legal action through trade unions Unison and the GMB.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Union sources said the payouts from this case alone will cost the city council tens of millions of pounds, with one citing a figure “of at least £50million” in back-dated claims for the discriminated workers.

Council bosses are not planning to appeal the legal ruling, marking the end of the long-running battle.

Unions had argued that while the claimants had been unfairly discriminated against before the new system was introduced a decade ago, the city council’s decision to continue the unequal pay was also discriminatory as it excluded women claimants from pay protection.

Union leaders hailed the decision as a huge victory. GMB Scotland secretary Gary Smith said:

“After years of legal wrangling by Glasgow City Council, this morning’s judgment paves the way for thousands of low-paid women to claim justice.

“The vast majority of them are our carers, caterers and cleaners, employed on the bottom rungs of the local government pay spine yet making some of the biggest contributions to the running of our local services.”

Mike Kirby, Unison’s Scottish Secretary, said:

“The pay protection win is great news. The way Glasgow rates and pays workers has been the source of conflict and division for ten years. These women have already waited long enough to receive the pay they have worked hard for and deserve. It’s time for Glasgow City Council to do the right thing and pay up on equal pay.”

The Court of Session has also been asked to consider whether the current council pay system is a valid pay scheme.

Unison had challenged the council’s method of measuring the value of jobs, in particular the use of different scales, one for core pay and others for non-core pay.

The union had argued the system made it impossible for employees to know if they were being paid equal.

Susan Aitken, Leader of Glasgow City Council said:

“This is a complex legal ruling. However it is now clear that the award of pay protection was done in a way which discriminated against some of our female workers at that time

“The right thing to do now is for the council to have open discussions with those workers and their representatives about how we give effect to this ruling. I hope there will be goodwill on both sides during those discussions.”

 

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

James Tamm: ‘Fire and Rehire’ – What do employers need to know?

"With three-quarters of the UK public against firing and rehiring and unions calling for a ban, businesses considering this strategy should proceed with caution."

Lucinda Bromfield: An extra day off for the Royal Wedding?

The decision as to whether or not to give...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you