Tribunal supports decision to fire care officer

-

An employment tribunal has ruled that a Senior Officer at a Dundee care home was correctly found guilty of gross misconduct and upholds the decision to dismiss her.

Janice McMeekin, a Senior Care Officer at Magdalen House, a home for adults with learning disabilities, was initially suspended on full pay in February 2011 after it was revealed that she allowed a staff member who had turned up drunk, to stay in the sleepover room rather than send her home.

Following an investigation, Miss McMeekin was given a formal written warning to remain on her file for a year.

Shortly after that warning had expired, evidence emerged that she had not applied creams to the feet of a female resident which she was supposed to do.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In the wake of this, evidence arose that she had not properly applied prescribed ointment to the eyes of a male resident and after three more cases came to light, senior management stepped in and spoke to Miss McMeekin.

She denied failing to apply the ointments and claimed that the other staff ”had it in for her.”

It was revealed that it was put to her that she may have difficulty applying the ointments, which was suggested with the aim of giving her an ”out,” and which would have allowed her to be given support and assistance, but she said she was fine and could manage her job.

Two further issues arose regarding medication administered by Miss McMeekin, and she was asked to attend a disciplinary meeting in March 2012.

At the meeting she claimed that those who had said she did not administer the ointments were lying, but did admit to having problems with her eyesight and varifocal glasses.

Priority Care Group Manager Linda Cuthill, who carried out the disciplinary hearing, concluded that Miss McMeekin was guilty of not applying the creams and this was seriously detrimental to the clients’ health.

As a result, Miss McMeekin’s behaviour was placed in the category of gross misconduct and she was dismissed.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Teresa Budworth: Feeling a bit awkward? Help is on its way!

Let’s face it, it can feel a little bit...

Connie Barrow: Are you giving candidate screening the attention it deserves?

I recently read an article published on the Telegraph’s...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you