Tribunal changes will lead to chequebook justice says union

-

Introducing fees to take claims to Employment Tribunals could have a huge impact on ensuring equality at work, TUC General Secretary, Brendan Barber, will warn a conference today (Friday).

In December the Government announced a package of measures including an overhaul of Employment Tribunals. Under the changes workers with a gross annual income of at least £13,000 a year (the minimum wage for a full-time job) or couples with a joint income above £18,000 a year could have to pay towards these fees – to pursue discrimination cases.

The TUC says that if the plans come into law, it will be harder in future to get proper enforcement and compliance with the law as employers will know that they face little realistic prospect of being held to account.

Said Brendan Barber:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“For the first time, individuals will have to pay as much as £1,750 to have a discrimination or equal pay claim heard by an Employment Tribunal – among the highest fees are to be charged under the proposed system.

“This is chequebook justice pure and simple and is a profoundly regressive step. As so few discrimination claims succeed at Tribunal anyway, many potential claimants, particularly those who lack the support of a union, would be put off from making a claim – giving a green light to unscrupulous employers to discriminate at will. That’s something that ought to concern everyone who cares about justice, fairness and equality.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Alison Huntingdon: Retaining female talent should come before revenues

The definition of success is different for everyone. For some it’s a lofty title and six-figure salary; for others it’s feeling like they’re making a difference. Others want a fulfilling career alongside the other important things in life: friends, family, and generally having a life outside work.

Adam Maskatiya: Is GDPR a new secret weapon for HR in the data privacy wars?

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the most significant change to data protection laws in nearly 20 years.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you