Equal pay case may cost Britain’s supermarkets millions in wages and back pay

-

shutterstock_136000457

Employment lawyers Leigh Day are representing 400 mainly female workers in an equal pay case against Asda that could end up costing Britain’s supermarkets millions of pounds in in higher wages and back pay.

The Asda case revolves around determining if supermarket store jobs, which are mainly held by women, are of equal value to higher-paid jobs in the distribution centres, jobs which are mainly held by men.

If successful, the workers could be entitled to six years back pay for the difference in wages. It will also have major implications for the rest of Britain’s supermarkets, particularly if they own their own distribution centres, as many do. “The implications for any supermarket are enormous,” said Michael Newman of Leigh Day, the firm representing the workers.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Michael Newman went on to say: “In the supermarkets check-out staff and shelf-stackers are mostly women. The people in the warehouses are pretty much all men. And, who would be surprised, the group that is mostly men gets paid more,” he said. “We are very confident that the jobs are pretty much the same. In the warehouses they take stuff off the shelves, put it on a pallet and stick it on a lorry. In the supermarket, they do the reverse: take the pallets off the lorry, unstack them and put stuff on the shelves.”

Asda said in a statement: “We are aware of a small number of claims. We pay a fair market rate for the job people do regardless of gender and we don’t recognise discrimination in our business.”

Victory would mark a significant step in the battle for equal pay, said Newman. “There has been huge advancement in the public sector. But in the private sector it is still the 1970s. Job evaluations don’t happen. Cases aren’t brought. So you still get this very segregated workplace. Women are over here doing the women’s work and men are over there doing men’s work.”

The case will be heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal within the next two months.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Why traditional training methods no longer work

In a faltering economy where managers and leaders are...

Emma Eagle: How has COVID-19 accelerated the future of work for Nespresso?

"To meet the new expectations of a divided post COVID-19 workforce, flexibility will be key, and Nespresso is reviewing how its practices will change to suit the working styles of different people."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you