Equal pay case may cost Britain’s supermarkets millions in wages and back pay

-

shutterstock_136000457

Employment lawyers Leigh Day are representing 400 mainly female workers in an equal pay case against Asda that could end up costing Britain’s supermarkets millions of pounds in in higher wages and back pay.

The Asda case revolves around determining if supermarket store jobs, which are mainly held by women, are of equal value to higher-paid jobs in the distribution centres, jobs which are mainly held by men.

If successful, the workers could be entitled to six years back pay for the difference in wages. It will also have major implications for the rest of Britain’s supermarkets, particularly if they own their own distribution centres, as many do. “The implications for any supermarket are enormous,” said Michael Newman of Leigh Day, the firm representing the workers.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Michael Newman went on to say: “In the supermarkets check-out staff and shelf-stackers are mostly women. The people in the warehouses are pretty much all men. And, who would be surprised, the group that is mostly men gets paid more,” he said. “We are very confident that the jobs are pretty much the same. In the warehouses they take stuff off the shelves, put it on a pallet and stick it on a lorry. In the supermarket, they do the reverse: take the pallets off the lorry, unstack them and put stuff on the shelves.”

Asda said in a statement: “We are aware of a small number of claims. We pay a fair market rate for the job people do regardless of gender and we don’t recognise discrimination in our business.”

Victory would mark a significant step in the battle for equal pay, said Newman. “There has been huge advancement in the public sector. But in the private sector it is still the 1970s. Job evaluations don’t happen. Cases aren’t brought. So you still get this very segregated workplace. Women are over here doing the women’s work and men are over there doing men’s work.”

The case will be heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal within the next two months.

Latest news

Unemployment set to top two million as energy shock hits UK jobs market

UK jobs outlook weakens as energy prices and global conflict push businesses to cut hiring and reduce headcount.

Hybrid working overtakes pay as firms compete for tech talent

Flexible working is now the leading tool for attracting tech talent, as employers prioritise hybrid roles and digital skills over salary in hiring and promotion.

‘Nearly half of employers lack formal wellbeing strategy’, raising concerns over support

Large numbers of organisations lack a structured approach to employee health support as workforce health concerns continue to grow.

Kate Dearden on ending workplace silence over harassment

“We are committed to ending a culture of silence and impunity and stand with all survivors of harassment and abuse in the workplace.”
- Advertisement -

Susie Al-Qassab: Ethical redundancy – doing it with dignity

How a business handles redundancy says more about its culture than almost anything else - affecting culture, morale and reputation as well as business health.

Co-op executive wins £100,000 in equal pay ruling after earning less than male colleagues

Former senior leader wins tribunal case after being paid less than male peers in a comparable executive role.

Must read

Simon Lyle: HR professionals are set to work 22 days overtime due to redundancies

"Every ‘simple’ redundancy typically cost HR professionals 7¼ hours of work."

Rob Rave: Annual staff surveys don’t engage employees

Most companies carry out an annual staff survey to...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you