Employment Tribunal changes will save £10m annually

-

Employment Tribunal changes will come into effect on Friday that will make it easier for businesses to take on staff and improve the process when staff have to be let go.

These changes are part of a radical reform package that will ultimately deliver direct net savings to business of more than £10m a year, with wider benefits to employers estimated at more than £40m a year.

The Government has streamlined Employment Tribunals to cut unnecessary demands on employers, and encourage growth, while safeguarding workers’ rights. From 6 April:

  • the qualifying period for claiming unfair dismissal will rise from one to two years;
  • judges will be able to sit alone in unfair dismissal cases;
  • witness statements can be provided in writing as opposed to the current rules where a witness reads their own statement out aloud; and
  • the maximum level for costs awarded to businesses winning a vexatious Tribunal claim will rise from £10,000 to £20,000. Deposit orders required by claimants when a judge determines that a part of claim is unmerited will increase from £500 to £1,000.

Business Secretary, Vince Cable, said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“For too long now the system in place for Employment Tribunals has been a bloated and bureaucratic obstacle for employers and the taxpayer. For employers they were finding that weak and vexatious cases were too much of the norm, too easy to bring forward, while for the taxpayer they were proving ever more expensive to run.

“We have seen claims drop in the last year and we want to see this continue as we introduce alternative measures in the coming months helping both parties resolve workplace disputes.”

The improvements to the Tribunals system follow a steady stream of announcements and initiatives to reduce the burden of regulation on business.

The Budget on 20 March included commitments to scrap or improve 84% of health and safety regulation, as well as introducing sector-based reviews to ensure that regulations are enforced in a way that results in the lowest possible cost to business.

The One-in, One-out rule – the first of its kind anywhere in the world – has begun to turn back the tide since it took effect in January 2011. Any minister who wants to introduce a new rule that generates costs for business must first identify a corresponding cut in regulation elsewhere with the same value.

On 28 February the Third Statement of New Regulation, which measures the success of the One-in, One-out rule, was published showing that around £4m of regulatory burdens will be cut from British businesses between January and June 2012. It also demonstrated that there has been cumulative net reduction of regulation since January 2011.

Business and Enterprise Minister, Mark Prisk, said:

“The One-in, One-out process is one of the best tools we have to cut the costs and burden of regulation on our businesses. But we know that changing the culture of regulation in Whitehall is a long-term job, and all of us in Government have to, and will, continue to root out red tape which poses more of a hindrance than a help to UK businesses.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Jane Firth: The CHRO’s guide to thriving in a private equity-backed portfolio company

Stepping into a private equity backed portfolio company presents unique challenges and opportunities for chief human resources officers.

Jennifer Liston-Smith: Have your employees been parenting loudly this summer?

Jennifer Liston-Smith, Head of Thought Leadership with Bright Horizons, discusses how employers have responded to the challenges of the summer holiday juggle for working parents.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you