What is the impact of shared parental leave?

-

shutterstock_109976480

The Government has recently confirmed its plans to introduce a new system of  ´shared parental leave´, to allow mothers and fathers more flexibility in sharing parental responsibilities following the birth or adoption of a child.

It has long been established that female employees have a right to take up to 52 weeks’ maternity leave – and they are required by law to take minimum compulsory maternity leave for the two weeks immediately following birth.

Further, since April 2011, fathers have been able to take advantage of a single period of up to 26 weeks’ additional paternity leave, but only after the baby is 20 weeks’ old and on condition that the mother returns to work.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

From April 2015, as an alternative, mothers and fathers will be able to take up to 50 weeks’ shared parental leave between them, either together or separately and, if preferred, in a series of blocks – provided any leave is taken within 52 weeks from birth.

The Government hopes that shared parental leave will “encourage more fathers and partners to play a greater caring role, enable both parents to retain a strong link with the labour market and allow employers and employees greater flexibility in how work and family commitments are balanced”.

In its response to a consultation on the shared parental leave proposals, the Government has given a broad outline of how the system will work:

  • employees must provide a non-binding indication of their expected pattern of leave at the outset and at least eight weeks’ notice of their intention to take a specified period of leave
  • there will be flexibility for employees to change their plans up to twice during the period of leave, provided they give at least eight weeks’ notice. A mother will also have the right to revoke any notice of shared parental leave within six weeks of birth if, for example, she decides to remain on maternity leave instead
  • during shared parental leave, each employee can work for up to 20 keeping in touch (“KIT”) days (in addition to the 10 KIT days available to a mother during maternity leave)
  • an employee will have the right to return to the same job, provided they have not taken more than 26 weeks’ leave in aggregate – otherwise the right is to return to the same job or, if that is not reasonably practicable, a similar job.

The response from many quarters has been very positive, although the proposals have not been universally welcomed. For example, the Institute of Directors has labelled them “unwieldy” and a “nightmare”. This conclusion is, perhaps, a little premature. Although it will affect businesses of all sizes, the true impact can only be assessed once draft regulations are published, setting out full details of how it will operate in practice.

Shared parental leave is certainly a positive move, but the Government must ensure that sufficient support is given to assist employers in administering the new scheme.

There is no doubt that it will assist in addressing inequality in the workplace and could help women to break through the widely publicised glass ceiling. Gender gaps in terms of salary and career progression are often associated with female employees taking time out to start a family.

From April 2015, we may well see more fathers taking extended time off work to allow the mother to return to work earlier, particularly where she is the main earner. This, in turn, could give female employees more flexibility to achieve their career aspirations, without feeling that they have to compromise a family life in order to fulfil work ambitions.

Article by Dominic Holmes, senior associate at international law firm Taylor Vinters, employment lawyer with particular expertise in employment litigation, TUPE, contractual issues and disability discrimination

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Ronni Zehavi: The ‘quitting economy’ – how HR can ensure businesses stay competitive in a new environment

"To attain a ‘Google Earth’ view of the workforce, HR are turning to analytics."

Katy McMinn: How HR can deal with mass redundancies

"Mass redundancies can be hugely stressful for everyone, not least the HR department or people professional handling the redundancy exercise."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you