What is the impact of shared parental leave?

-

shutterstock_109976480

The Government has recently confirmed its plans to introduce a new system of  ´shared parental leave´, to allow mothers and fathers more flexibility in sharing parental responsibilities following the birth or adoption of a child.

It has long been established that female employees have a right to take up to 52 weeks’ maternity leave – and they are required by law to take minimum compulsory maternity leave for the two weeks immediately following birth.

Further, since April 2011, fathers have been able to take advantage of a single period of up to 26 weeks’ additional paternity leave, but only after the baby is 20 weeks’ old and on condition that the mother returns to work.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

From April 2015, as an alternative, mothers and fathers will be able to take up to 50 weeks’ shared parental leave between them, either together or separately and, if preferred, in a series of blocks – provided any leave is taken within 52 weeks from birth.

The Government hopes that shared parental leave will “encourage more fathers and partners to play a greater caring role, enable both parents to retain a strong link with the labour market and allow employers and employees greater flexibility in how work and family commitments are balanced”.

In its response to a consultation on the shared parental leave proposals, the Government has given a broad outline of how the system will work:

  • employees must provide a non-binding indication of their expected pattern of leave at the outset and at least eight weeks’ notice of their intention to take a specified period of leave
  • there will be flexibility for employees to change their plans up to twice during the period of leave, provided they give at least eight weeks’ notice. A mother will also have the right to revoke any notice of shared parental leave within six weeks of birth if, for example, she decides to remain on maternity leave instead
  • during shared parental leave, each employee can work for up to 20 keeping in touch (“KIT”) days (in addition to the 10 KIT days available to a mother during maternity leave)
  • an employee will have the right to return to the same job, provided they have not taken more than 26 weeks’ leave in aggregate – otherwise the right is to return to the same job or, if that is not reasonably practicable, a similar job.

The response from many quarters has been very positive, although the proposals have not been universally welcomed. For example, the Institute of Directors has labelled them “unwieldy” and a “nightmare”. This conclusion is, perhaps, a little premature. Although it will affect businesses of all sizes, the true impact can only be assessed once draft regulations are published, setting out full details of how it will operate in practice.

Shared parental leave is certainly a positive move, but the Government must ensure that sufficient support is given to assist employers in administering the new scheme.

There is no doubt that it will assist in addressing inequality in the workplace and could help women to break through the widely publicised glass ceiling. Gender gaps in terms of salary and career progression are often associated with female employees taking time out to start a family.

From April 2015, we may well see more fathers taking extended time off work to allow the mother to return to work earlier, particularly where she is the main earner. This, in turn, could give female employees more flexibility to achieve their career aspirations, without feeling that they have to compromise a family life in order to fulfil work ambitions.

Article by Dominic Holmes, senior associate at international law firm Taylor Vinters, employment lawyer with particular expertise in employment litigation, TUPE, contractual issues and disability discrimination

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Laurie Padua: Talent Management in 2019

Laurie Padua forecasts the future of talent management in an era of AI and people analytics revolutionisation.

Paul Sesay: The dangers of tokenism

Tokenism in the workplace relates to when an organisation’s attitude towards diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) are superficial.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you