Just how much pregnancy & maternity discrimination is there in the workplace?

-

shutterstock_126133007

The Equality and Human Rights Commission will be undertaking a new comprehensive research project into the scale of pregnancy and maternity discrimination in the workplace.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that some pregnant women experience discrimination while on maternity leave or on their return to work. However, there is no up to date evidence as the most recent data goes back to 2005.

The project will investigate employers’ practices towards employees who are pregnant or on maternity leave, and these employee’s experiences in the workplace to provide evidence on the extent, causes and effects of pregnancy and maternity discrimination. This information will enable the Commission and Government to shape the most appropriate response.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The Commission proposed the project to the Department for Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) as part of a package of measures to address Equality and Human Rights, and Secretary of state Maria Miller has confirmed the funding to support this project.

Education for both employers and employees nationally will be key to tackling this issue and the Commission will assess how best to raise awareness of pregnancy and maternity rights.

Mark Hammond, Chief Executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said:  

“It is very concerning that in 2013 a number of women are still being disadvantaged in the workplace just because they are pregnant. That would be unlawful discrimination and needs to be tackled.

“We will look at existing research, gather new evidence and carry out our expert analysis to establish the extent of the problem and advise on how best it can to be addressed.”

Helen Croft, Partner at The Research Centre relates her experiences of discrimination: 

“It was whilst working as a sales director for a large corporate that I first encountered discrimination against women once they became pregnant. There was a notable absence of women in leadership roles in the organisation and at the most senior levels there were no women with children. There were numerous examples of successful and talented women in leadership roles returning from maternity leave into back office and support services roles in order to have a more flexible working pattern. It was made clear that front line roles could only be fulfilled by individuals prepared to commit not just to full time but to long working hours.

“Since leaving this organisation and working as a coach and business consultant I have encountered similar practices in other organisations, although in recent years there has been a shift towards more overt support for women during maternity. In some cases there is a mismatch between the professed support for women and the reality of their careers after maternity. A good example of this is a senior in-house corporate lawyer. She progressed rapidly in the organisation, achieving four promotions in five years before leaving for a period of maternity leave – during which she was supported with maternity coaching funded by the organisation. However, in the three years since her return she has been passed over for promotion on every occasion. This is a fact she resignedly accepts as a side effect of the “choice” she made. What is really going on here?”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Sabrina Munns: 2022 HR predictions and employee trends

"Even long into the pandemic, there are still curveballs that HR teams are having to manage, including changing government policies and the end of furlough."

What policies should be put in place to help staff with diabetes?

According to a recent study, nearly one in five workers with diabetes have been disciplined by their employer for taking time off from work.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you