John McCririck: “I was sacked because I was too old”

-

age-discriminationJohn McCririck, the former presenter on Channel 4 Racing, told an employment tribunal that he had been the victim of a “vendetta” against him by the “suits and skirts” in charge of the television company.

The 73-year-old claims he was sacked from Channel 4 Racing last October without any explanation because they wanted to hire someone younger and is now suing the broadcaster and IMG Sports Media, which produces its racing coverage, for £2.5m in punitive damages, and £500,000 compensation for loss of future earnings, unfair damage to his career, public humiliation, stress and mental anguish.

Speaking outside the employment tribunal, he stated:

“I was sacked because I was old, 72 — I am so angry.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“There are people in their 40s, 50s and 60s who dread that a younger person will come in and take them out of a job. That is why I am claiming £3m in total, so that no one will ever be sacked because they are trying to get a younger person. On merit and ability fine, but not because they are younger.”

He added:

“It’s because the suits and skirts, they are never answerable to anybody. They make their decisions, they can destroy people’s lives and careers and they are never made answerable. Now they are going to be answerable providing we can get over the legal argument.”

Channel 4, IMG Sports Media, Executive Producer, Carl Hicks, CEO, David Abraham, Channel 4 Sports Editor, Jamie Aitchison, and Channel 4 Chief Creative, Jay Hunt, are all listed as respondents to the claim.

The broadcaster denies that McCririck was discriminated against because of his age and claims that it never directly employed him.

An employment tribunal judge was hearing arguments about whether or not the presenter was employed by Channel 4, before deciding whether or not a full Tribunal will take place later this year.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

David Ogilvy: The end of retirement?

It is fashionable, in Employment Law and HR circles,...

The Google gender debate – nature versus nurture

Liz Cheaney, director of HR at Coffin Mews Solicitors discusses the Google gender debate and diversity in the workplace.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you