Fear or hope as maternity leave could be reduced

-

Maternity leave could be reduced to 18 weeks resulting in pay reductions for almost half of working mothers, unions have warned.
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) said that the government’s consultation on modern workplaces puts flexible working practices at risk.

Current legislation permits employed women to take 52 weeks off, with 39 weeks being paid and the remainder unpaid.

Employed fathers may take two weeks off after the birth of their child and receive statutory pay at a flat rate.

The government wants to change this system to allow for more shared parenting at the start of a child’s life.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has therefore proposed that women be provided 18 weeks of maternity leave and the remaining 34 weeks may be split between the parents as they see fit.

The TUC said it supports plans to encourage shared parenting, but said that the time new mothers are allowed to take off should be reduced to 26 weeks.

For the rest of the current year’s leave, parenting should be shared between the mother and the father.

Data analysed by the union group suggested that 60 per cent of working women who have taken leave to have children receive maternity pay above the statutory minimum.

As the vast majority of women get this for 26 weeks, reducing the designated leave to 18 weeks could lead some employers to reduce the length of contractual maternity pay.

This would effectively result in cuts in pay for women taking leave to have a baby.

“Weakening the right to request flexible working will give bad employers the wrong message and is the excuse they’ve been looking for to ignore requests,” said TUC general secretary Brendan Barber.

“The government should remember how successful and popular this right has been for parents over the last decade and put their needs ahead of the same old carping from business lobbyists.”

Latest news

New Sainsbury’s dismissal reignites debate over shoplifting intervention policies

Supermarket safety policies are under scrutiny as more retail workers lose jobs after confronting suspected thieves.

Cheryl-Anne Cooper: How human-led guest services drive employee wellbeing

The way people feel in a workplace matters just as much as how it functions, and guest service teams deliver experiences that reflect a brand’s culture and values.

Workplace injuries hit 60,000 as safety gaps widen across UK

Workplace accident rates reveal steep regional and sector differences, with serious injuries and fatalities continuing in high-risk industries.

Civil service attendance row raises questions over remote work oversight

Concerns over hybrid working oversight grow after claims of low office attendance across parts of the civil service.
- Advertisement -

UK leads Europe on salary transparency as EU pay deadline approaches

UK job adverts remain more open about pay than those in other major European economies as new transparency rules approach across the EU.

From factory floor to HR leader at CEVA Logistics

An HR leader at CEVA Logistics reflects on career growth, commuting, learning, leadership and balancing work with life at home.

Must read

James Uffindell: Competency-based interview questions

My team and I have recently reviewed over 480...

Mark Kaye: What does the extension of furlough scheme mean for employers?

Employment lawyer Mark Kaye at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP discusses the extension of the furlough scheme and what this means for employers and HR.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you