Checking emails during tasks is bad for productivity

-

Tens of thousands of pounds are being lost per person each year, because of distractions at work such as checking emails.

A study by the Economist in the US  has found that half of workers are unable to spend more than one uninterrupted hour a day, on a single task.

It says this results in 581 hours per person lost annually, which costs firms $34,448 (£25,398) per person.

The top two distractions are face-to-face interruptions from colleagues about work-related tasks and checking, reading, and responding to work-related emails.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Gloria Mark, a Professor at the University of California says: “Every time a person switches tasks, they make a cognitive shift which depletes their mental resources.”

 

Constantly checking emails is a major factor

The problem, however, is not the overall time spent checking emails, it is the frequency with which they are being checked. Nearly 70 percent of those polled said they checked their emails at least once an hour, preventing deeper periods of focus.

Cal Newport of Georgetown University said: “knowledge work is now, almost uniformly, via email. Anyone can reach anyone at any time for anything.”

Office spaces contribute to the loss of focus

Despite the emphasis on personal responsibility, the survey reveals that several causes of distraction are implicitly organisational. 

Open-plan office environments make economic sense, but can be highly distracting to some workers – face-to-face interruption is cited as the biggest source of distraction. 

For those working from home, the top distractions included easy access to food, TV, and video games.

Productivity losses vary by industry 

The hardest-hit industry in the US is professional, scientific, and technical services, which loses $178 billion (£131,283) in annual salary costs.

Information services had the greatest loss of focused time annually—an estimated salary cost of $62 billion (£45,7270 for the industry.

In the battle to reclaim focus, tech workers reigned supreme, employing diverse tactics such as putting on headphones, disabling phone, email, or desktop chat notifications, and reserving time for “no meeting” blocks.

Call for employers to build a culture of focus

Although individuals feel personally responsible for focus, most are at the mercy of their environment.

Alarmingly, the survey also found broader socio-economic factors at play with higher management staff able to focus considerably more than general staffers.

According to Mr. Newport, it is not enough for companies to simply tell workers to spend less time on their email; they need to re-think workflows in a deeper way. “If your company depends on unstructured, ad-hoc communication, telling people to check email less is not going to work.”

He is urging employers to build a culture of focus and be sensitive to ways in which organisational hierarchies might affect this, as the report found lower-ranked workers and middle managers face greater hurdles than executives and leaders.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Russell Kenrick: Mobilising project management training and skills

Global businesses face a number of serious challenges, ranging from the implementation of a new IT system to a complex change management process, or expansion into a new market. Large projects, worth more than $10m, are twice more likely to be late, over budget and miss critical features than small projects.

Dr Petra Simic: Five things GPs wish employers knew about workplace health

What are the best pieces of advice GPs can give to employers about looking after their staff?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you