HR and IT executives to clash over a summer of sport

-

  • 44% of European HR directors believe Olympic and/or Euro 2012 activities in the workplace will have a positive impact on their employees’ morale and motivation.
  • Security/bandwidth and operational concerns are main reasons for IT directors to ban sporting events from work PCs.

 

This summer of sport is set to cause conflict between HR and IT executives, according to research by Robert Half Technology.  More than four in 10 (41%) UK HR directors believe Olympic and/or Euro-2012 activities, such as watching game footage from PCs or engaging in friendly competitions in the office, have a positive impact on employee morale compared to 44% of European managers.

However, 53% of UK and 57% of European IT executives have stated that they will not allow employees to view Olympic and/or Euro 2012 coverage from their computers at work.  Concerned by the potential impact viewing major sporting events have on business infrastructure and operations,  IT executives cite their main reasons for restricting access to coverage as productivity, security and network capacity.

More than 1,200 UK and European HR Directors were asked, “Do you feel Olympic and/or Euro 2012 activities in the workplace will have a positive or negative impact on employee morale and motivation?” Their responses:

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

UK

Europe*

Very positive

14%

11%

Somewhat positive

27%

33%

No impact

44%

42%

Somewhat negative

11%

5%

Very negative

3%

2%

Don’t know

2%

7%

 

101%*

100%

Survey does not add to 100 due to rounding

While most HR directors have a positive or neutral view of the effect Olympic and/or Euro 2012 activities will have in the workplace, 14% of UK and 7% of European leaders feel there will be a negative impact, possibly the result of lower productivity levels or additional workloads from people taking annual leave. This might also echo feelings amongst other departmental leaders in the organisation, particularly technology executives.

350 UK and European CIOs/CTOs* were asked, “For what reasons will you not allow employees to view Olympic and/or Euro 2012 coverage from their computers at work?”  Their responses:

 

UK

Europe*

Employee productivity

77%

75%

Security

25%

31%

Network capacity

30%

28%

Other

4%

4%

 

Phil Sheridan, Managing Director, Robert Half Technology said: “We’re fortunate to have such an exciting and diverse summer of sport coming up, with Olympic, Euro 2012 and Wimbledon events providing ample opportunity to demonstrate our British pride while cheering on our favourite athletes.  It also gives companies the opportunity to host events in the office with the aim of building morale, motivation and teamwork, key considerations in making an organisation a great place to work.  There needs to be balance, however, with pragmatic IT directors sounding a word of caution about the outcomes of watching events on employee productivity, network bandwidth and security.

“One of the important elements of any IT director’s or manager’s role is to keep systems up and running – despite what may be happening in the world of sport. As with all perks, it’s important to balance the positive impact on employee morale against the overall needs of the business.”

Pamela Flores is an events professional with experience at Symposium Events, a UK-based conference and events organization. She has worked in editorial and event coordination roles within the HR and expatriate management sector, contributing to the organization of major conferences including the Expatriate Management and Global Mobility conference. Her background spans online editorial work and events management within the professional conference industry.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Ruth Ferguson: LinkedIn is not the only social media tool for recruiters

Social recruiting refers to the process of acquiring candidates...

Jo Sellick: Business leaders must set an example to boost employee engagement

Leading by example should be a priority for HR managers looking to integrate an employee engagement strategy and give staff a voice. Jo Sellick from Sellick Partnership discusses more.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you