Right to work flexibly should be extended, TUC states

-

In light of the Government’s announcement that the work from home order will be lifted from the 19th July, various bodies have called for flexible working to remain on the table for staff. 

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) have urged employers to consult staff and unions about continuing flexibility in working patterns and location.

This comes in response to the Government’s decision to allow employees to return to the office from the 19th July.

TUC General Secretary, Frances O’Grady, stated employers should remember that one size does not fit all when formulating their approach to returning to work:

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Flexible working isn’t just about working at home. It can mean having predictable or fixed hours, working as a job-share, or working flexitime, term-time only hours or compressed hours.

Ministers must bring in a new right to flexible working for every worker, in every job. Otherwise there will be a new class divide between those who can work flexibly from home, and those who can’t.

This view of offering flexible options to staff was also echoed by Peter Cheese, Chief Executive of the CIPD:

People generally want a mix of workplace and home working, and the possibility of more choice in their working routines, meaning hybrid working can provide an effective balance for many workers.

Employers should be trying to understand and support individuals’ preferences over more flexible working arrangements where possible, balanced with meeting the needs of the business.

However, Mr. Cheese also felt that businesses should cater for employees who cannot work from home:

Organisations should also look at increasing flexible working options for those who can’t work from home using different types of flexible hours arrangements.

This will help avoid the creation of a two-tier workforce where home and hybrid workers have considerable flexibility while many other employees have very little.

This comes after recent research from the CIPD found that there is regional disparity linked to which employees are more likely to receive flexible working.

Data released by the body found that workers in South East England have the best flexible working options, followed by the East of England, while workers in the Yorkshire and Humber are least likely to have flexibility in their role.

In addition, there was not the same variety of flexible working options offered – with regions where employees report better flexibility in hours tending to have less flexibility over where they work, such as the North East.

The same was also true the opposite way round – with Londoners being likely to have flexibility over where they work but expected to work set, standard hours.

At present, legally, employees who have worked for the same employer for at least 26 weeks have the right to put in a flexible working request.

However, many are pushing for flexible working options to be more readily available with the Shadow Minister for Education, Tulip Siddiq, introducing her ten minute Flexible Working Bill in Parliament last week.

The proposals would see staff receiving the right to flexible working from day one on the job, except in exceptional circumstances.

Ms. Siddiq stated:

Four in five workers want to work flexibly, but a shockingly high proportion of requests for this are rejected by employers – often with little or no justification.

The current law is outdated and we need new legislation to make flexible working a right for all rather than a perk for the few. My cross-party Flexible Working Bill would also give a huge boost to productivity, women’s employment and the economic recovery.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Maggie Berry: Dress codes, patronising or practical?

With Gen Y firmly established in the workplace, traditional...

Candidates vs recruiters: how automation will change everyone’s hiring experience

The robots will take over, soon there’ll be no jobs left.” Sound familiar? We’ve been hearing all about the threat of AI in the news for months now, but is all of this scaremongering really necessary?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you