“Name and shame firms breaking minimum wage law”

-

Publicly naming and shaming firms who are underpaying staff is effective but more needs to be done to prevent this practice.

A report by the Resolution Foundation shows that the Government’s “naming and shaming” of businesses failing to adhere to Minimum Wage Laws does act as a deterrent.

However, it admits the impact is small and only works in sectors where detection rates are already very high – for example big businesses.

The National Minimum Wage Naming Scheme was set up to “increase awareness of National Minimum Wage Legislation” and “to act as a deterrent to the minority of employers who may be tempted to underpay their workers”.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The Foundation reported that while minimum wage workers in micro-businesses are over a third (37 per cent) more likely to be underpaid the minimum wage compared to those in the largest businesses – they are less likely to get caught and named for doing so.

Big firms can defend themselves

Similarly, big companies who are named and shamed by the Government are often very equipped to manage the effects of bad press, making the strategy of publicly shaming the company less effective.

The Foundation’s research also found that naming and shaming is much more likely to be effective with small businesses who need to maintain a positive reputation in order to keep their company afloat.

Businesses were shown to most fear the effect that reputational damage could have on their relationship with other firms in their supply chain who might be reluctant to work with them after hearing negative reports.

As such, the research determined that increasing the impact of a reputational hit on non-compliant firms matters because the Government has said it will not increase the financial penalties imposed on businesses when they break labour market rules.

What can be done?

In light of this, the report recommends the Government to adopt a multifaceted approach to the issue, including:

  • Strengthening and raising the profile of the existing ‘naming and shaming’ policy
  • Complementing this policy with more rigorous enforcement, to increase the chances of rule-breaking firms being uncovered in the first place
  • Introducing tougher financial penalties, to further minimise the incentives for breaking the rules

Hannah Slaughter, Economist at the Resolution Foundation, said:

Reputation matters for businesses, and the Government should raise the profile of its welcome work to ‘name and shame’ those breaking minimum wage rules.

However, naming dodgy firms only works when they are caught in the first place, so more widespread enforcement is needed. And fines are currently too low so there is little economic incentive for rule-breaking employers to change their ways.

As well as raising the profile of the ‘naming and shaming’ regime, the Government must introduce tougher financial penalties and more widespread enforcement to ensure that rule-breaking firms are caught and deterred.


* This research has been documented in the Resolution Foundation’s new report ‘No shame, no gain?’, published in November 2021.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Staff turn to unauthorised AI as demand outpaces workplace policies

Employees are increasingly using AI tools without approval, raising concerns about data security, governance and workforce retention.
- Advertisement -

Targeted hiring grants beat tax cuts in tackling youth jobs crisis, report says

Expanding targeted hiring schemes would be a more cost-effective way to tackle youth unemployment than broad tax cuts, a report says.

Bar Huberman: Inclusion shouldn’t stop when Pride Month ends

Despite workplaces championing Pride Month, evidence shows that many LGBTQ+ employees continue to experience discrimination at work.

Must read

Tom Quayle: The University Challenge: What is a degree worth in 2015?

This year marks the graduation of the first students who had to pay £9,000 a year in tuition fees – and, worryingly, ComRes recently revealed that half of them feel their degrees weren’t worth the money.

Grant Wyatt: AI is as good as the standard you set

Most professionals treat AI like a vending machine: they click, prompt, and hope. When the output is mediocre, they blame the tool.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you