Poor Communication and Language Skills of Employees are Constraining International Growth Prospects of Companies

-

According to a global report out today, almost half of executives (49%) admit that communication misunderstandings and messages lost in translation have stood in the way of major international business deals and resulted in significant losses for their company. Brazilian and Chinese companies have been affected even more so with 74% and 61% respectively reporting financial losses as a result of failed cross-border transactions. This is of concern given many businesses are looking to new markets to unlock opportunities and grow their companies overseas.

 

The report, based on a global survey of 572 senior executives from private and public sector organisations worldwide and a series of in-depth interviews, was carried out by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and sponsored by EF Education First (EF). It reveals that almost two thirds of those surveyed (64%) think differences in language and culture have made it difficult to gain a foothold in foreign markets. And an overwhelming majority of executives believe that if cross-border communication were to improve at their company, then profits (89%), revenue (89%) and market share (86%) would each increase significantly.

 

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, despite the realisation that cross-border communications skills are inextricably linked to their company’s financial health, a significant proportion of companies are not taking sufficient action to address the root causes of misunderstandings. Almost half (47%) say their companies do not offer enough training to hone their employees’ language and communication skills, and two fifths (40%) believe there is not enough emphasis placed on recruiting or selecting people who are suited to cross-cultural environments. Linguistic diversity is considered by some margin to be a greater problem in Latin America and Southern Europe than elsewhere. For example, 38% in Brazil and 40% in Spain believe the language barrier to be a significant hindrance to effective cross-border relations.

 

Commenting on the findings, Andy Bailey, Chief Marketing Officer, EF Corporate Language Learning Solutions said: “The boundaries between old and new economies are increasingly blurred, and those same economies are evermore entwined and interdependent. Today’s businesses leaders need to ensure their employees are equipped with the right skills to communicate across borders effectively and efficiently”.   He continued, “Newer economies will fail on their internationalization plans, and older economies, who are already struggling, will find it almost impossible to regain their competitive foothold if businesses do not devote the appropriate time and resources into improving the international language skills of their key staff. It has never been so critical as it is today”.

 

The report also highlighted the pivotal role of English language in international business expansion, with the majority of executives emphasising the need for their employees to be proficient in English in order to compete on a global scale. According to the survey, English is the language that most executives (68%) think employees will need to know in order for their companies to grow successfully outside their home markets, followed by Mandarin (8%) and Spanish (6%).

 

Interestingly, the gap between current usage and the desired level of proficiency in English is greatest in China, showing the country’s increasingly external-facing business outlook. Only 9% of Chinese executives said that half their workforce now uses a foreign language in their job, but 86% also said their employees will need to know English if their companies are to carry out their international strategies successfully.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Better relations.. better work..

The Government has done much to improve the regulation of relations between employers and employees and has introduced important new protections for vulnerable employees. Analysis by Sarah Veale, Head of Equality and Employment Rights Department, Trades Union Congress.

Lindsay Gallard: How HR and Legal teams can address AI privacy concerns

AI’s rapid ascent to the top of the technology poses data privacy risks. Only joint approach from HR and Legal departments can tackle this.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you