Sickness absence more difficult to measure since COVID-19, firms report

-

Four in five businesses which record employee absence say this has become harder to measure since the onset of COVID-19. 

According to new research by GRiD, the industry body for the group risk protection sector, COVID-19 has made it more difficult for businesses to record sickness absence.

The data showed that although over four in five businesses (85 per cent) record sickness absence data, under two-thirds (63 per cent) actually measure the impact this has on their company.

When asked what the preferred method was for recording the impact of staff absence, almost half of businesses (44 per cent) stated recording the number of lost hours or days was their go-to choice.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Following this, two-fifths (40 per cent) calculated the cost of sick pay provision – e.g. Statutory Sick Pay and salary costs to understand how this is affecting their firm.

Other practices included analysing the cost of lost productivity (36 per cent), analysing direct costs such as for temporary staff and agency fees (33 per cent), and indirect costs – such as colleagues covering work, learning time, management time (33 per cent).

The body states that being able to record the impact of sickness absence is critical to companies as it allows HR to put forward the case for employee benefits that support both the individual and the company.

This comes as recent research found that sickness absence falls to its lowest rate in 15 years – a statistic which has largely been attributed to furlough, homeworking and shielding.

Over the last year, the sickness absence rate dropped to just 2.2 per cent – down by 0.5 per cent compared to the year before.

Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD, said:

The options, preferences, and levels of sophistication in recording absences will always vary from business to business. For example, it’s much easier to record lost productivity in a production line than it is in a service-based industry.

However, it’s absolutely vital for allemployers to record and analyse their absence data because it enables the employer to trigger a response for employees, such as early intervention support. We know that the longer an individual is off work, the more difficult it can be for them to return which can be hugely disruptive to the employer and their business.


*The research was undertaken by Opinium during January 2021 among 505 HR decision makers at UK businesses.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Ben Black: Shared Parental Leave – One year on

True but completely unfair. Before I explain why let me set out a bit of background. The world would be a million times better – actually $12 trillion better – if we truly had equality. But equality is a long and complex journey. It doesn’t only involve recognising female talent (the best businesses already bend over backwards to help their best women fulfil their potential); it also involves changing the world so that men and women do the jobs they are best suited to rather than the ones society tells them to do.

Sheena Pickersgill: Workplace culture is key to effective talent management

The ground rules around employment are changing. The carrots of a high salary or a “steady” job no longer hold the allure they once did. The young Gens want flexibility and meaningful work and are likely to move on once the initial excitement of a new workplace wears off. So, what does that mean for talent management in the future?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you