Stylist fails in attempt to claim wages for time in jail

-

A hairdresser has failed in a bid to force her former employer to pay her wages for the time she was in prison.

Kelly Atkins was jailed for two years in December 2011 and Miss Atkins’ civil claim against her former employer, Hair by Loretta, was rejected at an employment tribunal after she failed to turn up for the hearing, despite staff trying to contact her.

Atkins had demanded £7,000 in back-pay for the nine months she served in prison, but her claims of constructive dismissal were thrown out by Chairman Victoria Wallace at Ashford Employment Tribunal.

Both Miss Atkins and her ex-boss said that Atkins had taken annual leave to attend her trial in December 2011 in written statements to the tribunal, and in other documents submitted, Miss Atkins claimed that her employer made assurances her job was safe before she was convicted.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In her statement, Miss Atkins said of her ex-boss:

“She said no matter what happens I will always have my job.

“I came home on 27 June 2012, and rang Mrs McDonald to ask if I could come back to work and the reply to that was ‘no’.”

However, Mrs McDonald said there was no agreement to keep a job open and that her business was stigmatised by her worker’s conviction.

In a written statement, she told the tribunal:

“The case became national news and was featured on radio, television, newspapers and on the internet.

“Of course, this became a problem for me. Her regular customers deserted the salon.”

Following the hearing, David McDonald, who owns the salon with his wife, said:

“It made us feel absolutely sick. We have gone through absolute hell for the last three months and we’re not healthy people.”

Chairman Victoria Wallace also ruled out an adjournment, saying:

“It seems to me it’s not sensible that we could really sensibly look at it without both parties being here.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Winston Churchill: A textbook leader?

Churchill is renowned for his leadership skills - taking a wider strategic view to the war. What can the world of HR learn from this war-time Prime Minister?

Daniel Stander: Is it lawful for employees to take on a second job?

"From time to time, a second job may pose risks to an employer, including conflicts of interest, absence issues, leaks of confidential information and reputational damage".
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you