New fathers are not taking paternity leave says TUC

-

A study by the TUC has found that of the 285,000 men who could have taken paternity leave in 2011/12, only 1,650 elected to do so.

According to the research, new fathers are not taking up extra paternity leave to look after their children because of the low pay they would receive.

The system, which allows men to take up to 26 weeks additional paternity leave and receive additional statutory paternity pay (£136-a-week), was only introduced in April 2011 and the TUC figures are based on its first year.

Commenting on the figures, TUC General Secretary, Frances O’Grady, said:

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“A good gift for fathers this Sunday would be for ministers to increase statutory paternity pay rates and for employers to top it up for longer, so that new dads can spend more time with their children.

“Poor levels of financial support are preventing new dads from taking extra time off and are particularly affecting low-paid fathers who simply cannot afford to take leave.

“Extending paternity pay from two to six weeks and paying a better statutory rate would make a massive difference, as has been shown in other countries.”

The TUC said that in contrast, the majority of fathers do choose to take the first two weeks of paternity leave. Its research revealed that nine out of ten fathers take the two weeks, however the difference is that although the statutory rate is the same, many employers typically choose to top this up to full pay throughout that short period of leave.

A Business Department spokesman said:

“The current system for parental leave is old-fashioned and too rigid. This is why we are introducing a system of shared parental leave from April 2015 so that fathers can take more leave if they want to in the early days of a child’s life.

“We want to challenge the myth that it is the mother’s role to stay at home and care for children.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Dawn Brown: HR horror stories to haunt you this Halloween

How should HR deal with email scams and lying candidates?

Nick Le Riche: Labour’s plans to create a single status of “worker”

"Labour estimates that its proposals would benefit an extra 6.1 million people, a considerable proportion of the UK workforce; what impact, however, would they have on employers?"
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you