Sports Direct scandal over zero-hour contracts

-

Pressure is mounting on Mike Ashley and his Sports Direct empire over its use of zero-hours contracts for part-time employees, as the Unite trade union demanded a meeting with the billionaire businessman.

As 2,000 full-time staff at Sports Direct prepare to cash in bonuses of up to £100,000, it has been revealed that the company’s entire 20,000 part-time workforce are employed on zero-hour contracts, according to data from the Office for National Statistics.

Sports Direct hires every part-timer under a deal that denies them holiday or sick pay and cannot guarantee how many hours they will work each week.

The zero-hours contracts are in use despite the company introducing a generous bonus scheme for full-time staff. Full-time workers at Sports Direct are set to collect a bonus worth more than £70,000 in company shares next month.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Those on the contracts often find themselves unsure if they will have work from one week to the next. Although they are able to turn down work, many fear that doing so means they will not be asked again in the future.

Employment lawyers warn that the deal makes it difficult to manage family and childcare commitments, and presents problems when budgeting for household bills or trying to secure a mortgage.

However, organisations investigating the impact of the contracts claim the revelations show their use is far more widespread than indicated by the ONS.

Business Secretary Vince Cable announced an investigation into zero-hour contracts following ‘anecdotal evidence of abuse’ by employers – including those in the public sector. ‘Whilst it’s important our workforce remains flexible, it is equally important that it is treated fairly,’ he said.

James Plunkett, director of policy at the Resolution Foundation, said: “These new revelations show again that no one really knows how many workers are on zero-hours contracts – every official estimate seems to have drastically understated the scale of the issue. While it seems to us too early to ban zero-hours contracts, the case for reform is clear.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Adam Maskatiya: Is GDPR a new secret weapon for HR in the data privacy wars?

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the most significant change to data protection laws in nearly 20 years.

Nii Cleland: Workplace racial equity: what’s changed since May 2020?

Nii Cleland explores why there has been such slow progress improving racial equity within organisations.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you