Nine in 10 employers ‘find discrepancies during candidate screening’

-

That’s according to new research from global background screening provider HireRight. The organisation’s 18th annual Global Benchmark Report found that 90 percent of businesses in the EMEA region had discovered inconsistencies during pre-employment screening.

The survey, based on responses from over 1,000 HR, risk and talent acquisition professionals globally, shows that the most common discrepancies were found in employment history (64%) and education records (47%). In addition, 22 percent of employers uncovered unreported criminal convictions through background checks.

The findings come amid growing concern over identity fraud and the increasing use of AI by candidates in job applications. Despite this, many employers are yet to implement robust identity verification processes or develop clear strategies for the use of AI in recruitment.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Identity fraud on the rise but checks remain patchy

The report notes the continuing threat of identity fraud, with nearly one in five EMEA businesses (19%) having already experienced it. An additional 19 percent said they were unsure whether they had been affected, raising questions over detection capability.

Despite the financial and reputational risks, many companies still do not routinely carry out identity verification as part of their pre-employment screening. According to fraud prevention organisation Cifas, identity fraud costs the UK an estimated £1.8 billion per year, with more than 237,000 cases reported in 2023. Early indicators from Cifas suggest that fraud levels are continuing to increase.

Peter Cleverton, EVP of International at HireRight, said, “With nine out of 10 businesses in EMEA identifying discrepancies during the candidate screening process, it’s clear that the challenges facing employers are intensifying – particularly as both identity fraud and AI-assisted job applications become more prevalent.”

Uncertainty around AI in recruitment

Despite widespread industry attention, many HR professionals remain uncertain about the role of AI in their processes. Globally, almost half of respondents said they were unsure whether AI tools would be adopted for core HR functions during 2025. In EMEA, just 36 percent of organisations said they plan to start or continue using AI in HR this year, while 33 percent remain undecided and 31 percent say they will not use AI tools.

Among those already using AI, the most common applications include candidate selection and CV filtering, onboarding processes and employee training. These same areas are also the top focus for companies planning to introduce AI in the near future.

However, only a small proportion of employers feel confident in detecting AI-generated content in job applications. Just 4 percent of EMEA respondents said they were very confident in identifying when AI tools had been used by candidates, while 29 percent said they had little or no confidence.

Mixed views on AI-generated applications

Employer sentiment around the use of AI by candidates is still evolving. When asked how they feel about AI-assisted applications, 72 percent of EMEA-based HR professionals said they were neutral or unsure. The remaining respondents were equally split between viewing it positively – as a way to identify well-matched candidates more efficiently – and negatively, due to concerns about the potential for misrepresentation.

This uncertainty is prompting calls for more structured approaches to the integration of AI in both recruitment and candidate screening.

Cleverton added, “Our latest Global Benchmark Report highlights the urgent need for organisations to review their screening processes and packages to thoughtfully evaluate how AI is used in both hiring practices and candidate applications. As the landscape evolves, trust, transparency and vigilance will be key to building effective and secure workforces.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Time to Talk Day: Supporting employees with mental health issues

In light of the 2nd Annual Time to Talk...

James Herbert: Time for an awkward conversation?

"It’s hard to know what’s really going on in workers’ lives."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you