Marks & Spencer tells contractor to cut cleaners’ pay

-

‘Callous’ retail giant Marks & Spencer tells contractor to cut cleaners’ pay at distribution centre.

Workers now face a fire and rehire if they do not agree to these lesser terms, says GMB union.

 

The cut of cleaners’ pay: what has exactly happened?

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

GMB members employed by GS Associates, who provide a cleaning service at a Marks & Spencer distribution centre in Thorncliffe, South Yorkshire, have been told their hourly rate of pay is to be cut – at the instruction of the retail giant. 

Workers were given a pay rise in February, but have now been told their hourly rate of pay is to be cut citing ‘human error in calculating the increase which cannot be sustained economically by GS Associates Ltd nor Marks & Spencer’.  

Workers are now being threatened with fire and rehire if they do not accept their pay being slashed from £11.41 per hour to £10 per hour.  

One worker, who did not wish to be named, has been left with no choice but to leave his job, saying “he was already struggling to keep up with the cost-of-living and put food on the table for his family – he just couldn’t afford to take the hit to his wages and will have to look for another job.”.  

 

Lee Parkinson, GMB Organiser, said: “This treatment of our members is disgraceful and callous.

 “GA Associates and their client, Marks & Spencer, should hang their heads in shame. 

“We are asking Marks and Spencer to do the right thing and reinstate our members’ pay as a matter of urgency.   

“These members are low paid workers already on the breadline.  

“They cannot afford to have their pay cut during the worst cost of living crisis in a generation.” 

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Paul Berry: How to lead high-performing teams

The problem with performance is that it often gets equated with profitability or return on equity. In other words, the focus is on the outcomes, not the process. This creates a ‘results-driven’ culture, where teams become overly-focused on short-term gains.

Emilie Bennetts: Misconduct outside work – a fair dismissal?

Gross misconduct in the workplace or during working time...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you