Employers using AI in hiring triples

-

In a shift toward modernising recruitment processes, a new report from the Institute of Student Employers (ISE) reveals that the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by employers has tripled, marking a substantial increase in the adoption of technology to streamline hiring practices.

According to the ISE findings, nearly a third (28%) of employers are now leveraging AI in their recruitment processes, a significant jump from the 9 percent reported in 2022.

The ISE, whose members collectively recruit tens of thousands of graduates and apprentices annually, conducted a comprehensive study showcasing the diverse applications of AI within the hiring landscape.

One of the most prevalent uses of AI was identified in online psychometric assessments, demonstrating the technology’s versatility.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Additionally, employers reported using AI for pre-screening candidates, updating them on the application process, and analysing video interviews.

High volumes of candidates can be tackled

The adoption of AI comes as job applications skyrocketed to 86 per vacancy this year, a 23 percent increase from the previous year. Faced with managing these high volumes of candidates, employers expressed a need for quicker and more efficient recruitment processes.

The survey indicated that AI was perceived as a valuable tool, with 83 percent of employers reporting increased speed and efficiency. It also enabled the analysis of large volumes of data (64%) and automated repetitive tasks (59%). Furthermore, 17 percent of respondents found AI to be a cost-effective alternative to traditional hiring methods, and 8 percent believed it enhanced the likelihood of finding the best candidate for the job.

However, amidst the growing reliance on AI, 70 percent of employers expressed a preference for a more human-centric approach in the recruitment process. Concerns about the reliability of AI (63%) and the secure handling of data (33%) were cited as potential drawbacks.

Speed and efficiency

According to Georgia Greer, Head of Insights at ISE, “AI is creating opportunities for employers to do things differently in a more effective way. With the rise in job applications, the increased speed and efficiency is particularly attractive. It should improve the candidate experience too.”

Greer acknowledges the ongoing debate among recruiters about the ethical implications of removing human interaction from the hiring process. “As AI evolves and improves, confidence will grow, and some of those concerns should fall away,” she added.

Despite the evident benefits, limitations in budget and resources, as well as a lack of capability to implement AI systems, were identified as the primary reasons preventing more widespread adoption.

Greer concluded, “From a candidate perspective, they may be asked to use tools like ChatGPT to answer questions and playback their experience at the interview. But, at the moment, AI is mainly being used to assess performance in the process, so it’s not something candidates will always be aware of or can prepare for.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Yoko Spirig: How equity can tackle the UK’s employee disengagement crisis 

Yoko Spirig, CEO at Ledgy, digs into disengagement at work and explores how equity can empower employees to take greater ownership in their roles.

Charles Courquin: The War for Talent – How a focus on recruitment can support an efficient HR strategy

"To compete effectively in this war for talent, employers first need to ensure that their recruitment and onboarding processes are smooth, streamlined and efficient."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you