<

!Google ads have two elements of code. This is the 'header' code. There will be another short tag of code that is placed whereever you want the ads to appear. These tags are generated in the Google DFP ad manager. Go to Ad Units = Tags. If you update the code, you need to replace both elements.> <! Prime Home Page Banner (usually shows to right of logo) It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section*> <! 728x90_1_home_hrreview - This can be turned off if needed - it shows at the top of the content, but under the header menu. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section * > <! 728x90_2_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 1st or 2nd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! 728x90_3_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 2nd or 3rd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! Footer - 970x250_large_footerboard_hrreview. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section* > <! MPU1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section3* > <! MPU4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_3 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_5 are not currently being used - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Bombora simple version of script - not inlcuding Google Analytics code* >

‘Fire and rehire’ Bill to be debated in Parliament today

-

A Private Members’ Bill, which intends to see ‘fire and rehire’ practices limited, is to be debated in the House of Commons today (22nd October). 

A second reading of a bill which aims to see fire and rehire practices being limited in the UK is set to occur today.

First brought forward by Labour MP Barry Gardiner, the Bill has gained traction as the use of fire and rehire tactics have grown throughout the pandemic.

The bill stipulates that employees should be made aware and fully consulted regarding any fire and rehire plans.

If a dispute occurred between an employer and its staff, an independent committee would decide on whether the fire and rehire could go ahead.

Notably, the company British Gas made headlines earlier this year as it threatened to dismiss hundreds of engineers who failed to sign new contracts which called for longer hours and lower pay.

However, research indicated this practice had become more common across the board with almost one in 10 workers (9 per cent) having been asked to re-apply for their current job but on worse conditions since March 2020.

Mr. Gardiner stated that supporting the Bill would reduce intimidation, stop firing as a tactic, improve work certainty and increase co-operation.

In legal terms, the practice of firing and rehiring is lawful but can lead to unfair dismissal claims if established procedures, including collective consultation, are not staunchly followed.

Ahead of tomorrow’s vote, leader of the Labour Party, Keir Starmer, urged Prime Minister Boris Johnson to “stand by his own words” and “stop selling out working people and join Labour MPs to outlaw this despicable practice”.

He further added:

Fire and rehire is an appalling tactic to get around the law and cheat working people out of the pay and conditions that they have earned through their hard work.

[The Bill] will [enable staff] to claim automatic unfair dismissal if their employer tries to force them onto a worse contract.

Earlier this year, the Prime Minister stated firing and rehiring staff was “unacceptable” in order to boost a company’s profits.

However, news outlets have reported that Conservative MPs are allegedly being urged to vote against the bill.

If the bill passes the second stage, it will then proceed to committee stage where each clause and any amendments to the bill will be debated.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

Paul Evans: Mediation – what’s really going on

The 2013 Employment Tribunal Rules and Acas early conciliation...

Daniel Stander: Is it lawful for employees to take on a second job?

"From time to time, a second job may pose risks to an employer, including conflicts of interest, absence issues, leaks of confidential information and reputational damage".
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Exit mobile version