Employers concerned about cost and admin burden of Additional Paternity Leave

-

Employers are concerned that the new Additional Paternity Leave (APL) rules will negatively impact their companies, according to law firm Davies Arnold Cooper.
The report shows 82% of employers surveyed think cost, absence or administrative burdens prove harmful.

The main employer concerns are cost of providing cover (35%), too many employees being absent (8%), administration costs (2%) or all of the above (48%)

But most employers (74%) think less than a quarter of eligible employees would take advantage of their new right to APL, which will enable new fathers to request up to six months’ paternity leave from April 2011 onwards.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The finding, that 64% of companies say at present less than a quarter of eligible employees in their organisations took any paternity leave, reinforces this.

When respondents stated they expected APL to be taken, half (53%) believed that employees would take less than one month of leave, while a further 43% believed employees would take no more than between one and three months.

Only 2% of respondents expect any of their employees to take the maximum six months available.

The self-certification process for the father concerned 76% of respondents, while 94% indicated they would prefer to be provided with information from the mother’s employer and a copy of the birth/adoption certificate automatically.

Whilst HMRC is going to undertake spot compliance checks, it does not seem that this sufficiently reassures employers. On a more positive note, 30% of respondents believed a benefit would be that mothers would return to work earlier and 42% also believed that greater flexibility in respect of childcare was advantageous to their organisation.

Wendy Trehy, partner and employment law specialist at Davies Arnold Cooper, said: “Despite the fact that there was a significant amount of consultation undertaken by the Government on the introduction of APL, employer opinion is divided and significant concerns remain. We will have to wait and see how many fathers do take up this right, what the costs to employers ultimately are and if this has the adverse impacts feared.

“Carefully tailored policies can eliminate many areas of concern; however, the cost to business will only be able to be assessed once we see how APL works with existing legislation.”



Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Florence Parot: Using technology

Last time we looked at how best to use our electronic devices at work. But there is also something to be said for how we use them outside work. Not only for our general life balance but also because that balance in itself will affect how efficient we can be at work. Our brain can only take so much as we have emphasized over the past months.

Kate Palmer: What does the General Election mean for employment law?

Kate Palmer takes a look at the main political parties and the promises being made around workplace reform.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you