Robert Leeming: The view in America – the fight for paid sick leave

-

Hillary Clinton launching her campaign for president in the summer on Roosevelt Island in New York. She is in favour of providing paid sick leave to American workers

With all the tumult and fire of the American presidential election season currently being focused on Donald Trump and his often delusional and downright bizarre statements on immigration, one of the key policy battlegrounds of the campaign so far is being neglected: the fight for the American worker.

As I mentioned in my last post, there is currently no statutory right for the American father to have paid paternity leave from work, something some candidates on the Democratic side, such as Hillary Clinton want to change. Another quite surprising omission is the failure to provide via law paid sick leave, which is currently not guaranteed at a national level, although it is provided in three states and in a handful of cities.

Hillary Clinton has proposed the founding of a $1 billion a year innovation fund to encourage states to set up family leave and paid leave policies. The former first lady and senator for New York has also cosponsored legislation on numerous occasions to provide seven paid sick days a year to American workers.

President Obama is very much on the same page and he has been a strong supporter of worker’s rights since he took office in 2009. In fact one of the first pieces of legislation he signed when he came into office was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pair Act. In his 2015 State of the Union address Obama announced that he intended to take action to ‘help states adopt paid leave laws of their own’. He then went on to call on the US congress to “send me a bill that gives every worker in America the opportunity to earn seven days of paid sick leave.”

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The problem with this is that the Republican controlled Congress has, time and again, proved it is unwilling to work with Obama on, well, practically every issue set before it, but on this issue there is a chink of light. In March the Healthy Families Act, which would allow American families those seven days of sick leave gained a surprise bipartisan vote of confidence in the senate. That doesn’t mean that paid sick leave is now law, the vote was on a budget resolution, which is not binding, however the vote was symbolic, suggesting that this is an issue were progress can be made.

However, every Republican senator who is currently running for president, Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul, voted against the paid sick leave amendment. And, of those Republicans running who are not senators most indicators suggest that they would be firmly against the idea, although most have not yet set out a position. This is not necessarily because Republicans are against extending worker’s rights, rather they are in favour, in the style of Ronald Reagan, of reducing the power and reach of government and would never back the government installing a law that forced, via the law, businesses to allow paid sick leave.

Read more about America’s attitude towards paid paternity leave here: https://www.hrreview.co.uk/blogs/blogs-diversity-equality/the-view-from-america-the-u-s-s-nonexistent-parental-leave/60264

Robert joined the HRreview editorial team in October 2015. After graduating from the University of Salford in 2009 with a BA in Politics, Robert has spent several years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past he has been part of editorial teams at Flux Magazine, Mondo*Arc Magazine and The Marine Professional.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Eleanor Bradley: An online portfolio is the graduate’s best friend

Finishing university can be a daunting time for young...

Christine Chenneour: Will wearables at work drive better corporate wellness?

Hands up who received a Fitbit for Christmas? Or a Jawbone? Apple Watch? Well, I know one million wearable devices were sold in the UK this festive season so there are many of you reading this with something new on your wrist.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you