Paul Reeves: Changes to flexible working

-

Plans to extend the right to request flexible working to all employees have been put on hold following the slow progress of the Children and Families Bill through Parliament. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has stated that the new rules on the right to request flexible working will be implemented today 30 June 2014.

Formerly, only employees who had children aged 17 or younger (or 18 or younger where the child is disabled) and those employees who act as carers had the right to request flexible working. In addition to these requirements, in order to be eligible, an employee must have 26 weeks’ continuous service at the date of the request and must not have made a flexible working request within previous twelve months.

It is important to note that an eligible employee only has the right to request flexible working. There is no right to work flexibly. In making a request, eligible employees may request a change to their working hours, times or location from which they carry out the work.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The statutory procedure contained in the Flexible Working (Procedural Requirements) Regulations 2002, set out the steps that both employees and employers must follow. In summary, these include:

  • The employee submitting a written application detailing the proposed changes and setting out how those changes may affect the business
  • Within 28 days of receiving the written request, the employer meets with the employee to discuss the request
  • Within 14 days of the meeting, the employer writes to the employee agreeing to or rejecting the proposal
  • If the proposal is agreed, the employer provides a letter confirming the variation of employee’s working arrangement
  • If the proposal is rejected, the employer provides reasons for rejection and sets out the appeal procedure
  • Any appeal must be made within 14 days of the decision
  • Within 14 days of the appeal being received the employer meets to hear the appeal
  • Within 14 days of the appeal meeting, the employer must give its decision in writing

The new proposals coming into effect today (30 June 2014), extend the right to request flexible working to all employees who meet the qualifying period of service regardless of their personal circumstances.

Employees will still need to meet the same qualifying criteria as currently applied (see above). Employees will no longer need to qualify as a parent or a carer in order to be eligible to request flexible working, but they will need to have the requisite service and not have made a request in the previous twelve months.

In addition the proposal goes further and seeks to abolish the current statutory procedure (see above) and introduce a more informal process of dealing with such requests. It will be up to the individual employer to determine what procedure to follow, although it is most likely that procedures set out in the Employee Handbook or Flexible Working Policy will remain the employer’s preferred procedure, save that they are not bound by the rigid timeframe currently in force for each stage. Although the recommendation under the new proposal is for employers to ensure they respond to employees’ requests in a timely manner, and certainly within three months of receiving the request – coincidentally the same amount of time the current regime would take from commencement to the end of the appeal process.

In addition, requests must be considered objectively and can only be refused if there are genuine business reasons for such refusal. Business reasons may include:

  • additional costs to the business
  • inability to reorganise work among employees
  • inability to recruit additional staff
  • detrimental impact on quality
  • detrimental impact on business’ ability to meet customer demand
  • detrimental impact on an individual’s or business performance
  • insufficient work during the proposed periods of work
  • planned structural changes

The proposals emphasise that any requests for flexible working must be dealt with in a reasonable manner. Care should be exercised to ensure that requests are treated consistently to avoid any potential claims of discrimination or associative discrimination.

Although the new rules attempt to move forward from the statutory procedure and make the process more informal, employers must give careful consideration to a request particularly if the request is rejected. Sadly the onus remains on the employer in the process, when there needs to be more emphasis on the employee planning their request and how it will work with the employer’s business in practice.

The greatest challenge for employers under the proposal is how they will decide between two competing requests: one from an employee requesting the right to work flexibly because of child care reasons and another from an employee who is making the request for a non-child care or carer reason, i.e. lifestyle choice?

The two most important points to remember – right to request flexible working is not a right to flexible working and any change agreed will be a permanent change to an employee’s contract, so if their circumstances change there is no right to go back to their original working arrangement.

Paul Reeves, employment partner at Stephenson Harwood LLP

Dealing with all aspects of UK employment law. Acting for a broad spectrum of clients including Blue Chip FTSE 100 companies, financial services, insurance, media companies, luxury goods producers & distributors and manufacturing clients on their most sensitive mandates.

Particular expertise in advising clients on:

# disciplinary and grievance procedures
# sensitive internal investigations
# high level recruitment or exits of employees
# contractual disputes
# employment litigation (all levels of court and employment tribunals including conducting my own advocacy)
# redundancies, restructuring and reorganisations
# outsourcing agreements
# transactional advice (share sale or TUPE)
# negotiating senior exits
# formulating and implementing social media polices
# advising new businesses on creating and developing employment documentation

I am recognised in the UK legal directories for employment law advice:

"Pragmatic and commercially sound" - Legal 500.

"Commercially focused ...as well as being proactive and responsive," Chambers & Partners

Seconded to the General Counsel Division of the UK's Financial Services Authority.

Specialties: Employment and Pensions

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Recruiting diversity for success

There are many people who quibble over diversity recruitment. Some argue for advertising in certain minority media and specialist websites. Others call for changes in the law that would allow them to fast-track under-represented groups. Andrew Tromans, Director of Search & Selection at Waterhouse Consulting Group explains.

Should business be forced by government to disclose how much employees earn?

In the United States President Obama recently announced that the American government will be collecting detailed salary data by race and gender for every business in the country with more than 100 employees.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you