Why is the cost of hiring so high?

-

SMEs will be hit by surprise recruitment costs, with £22.5 billion needed to replace the 7.5 million small business workers looking to move roles.

Replacing staff will cost UK businesses a total of £41.9bn as well as battling soaring energy and running costs.

While job satisfaction is high among UK workers, nearly half (46%) are still considering changing jobs, according to research by Westfield Health.

Job satisfaction levels

More than three-quarters of workers (76%) said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with their job. These findings demonstrate that businesses unaware of the exodus coming their way may struggle to retain talent, even when improving their employees’ job satisfaction. This is going to hit SMEs particularly hard who will be faced with mammoth unplanned recruitment bills alongside fighting soaring running costs.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Commenting on these results, Dave Capper, CEO at Westfield Health, said: “Even though our research reveals the good news that many employees are happy at their current job, a worrying amount of people are still considering leaving.

“The average cost of hiring someone new is around £3,000. Coupled with the cost-of-living crisis, struggling with retention of workers could have a big impact on businesses, especially if the UK heads into a recession. SME leaders are facing huge financial challenges as it is, pair this with further unexpected recruitment bills and there’s a real cause for concern.”

Small businesses have the chance to poach big talent

The research also shows that whilst around half of workers do not have a preference (53%), more than a third (34%) say they would prefer to work for an SME with fewer than 250 employees. Smaller businesses are seen to lead the way when it comes to particular perks, with over a half stating working at an SME gives them better contact with senior leaders (60%), maintains a good workplace culture (48%) and allows them to have a better work-life balance (35%).

On the other hand, larger businesses with more than 250 employees ticked the more traditional benefits. In general, employees stated that working at a larger business offers better salaries (40%), career progression (44%) and physical health support (51%).

However, working at a bigger organisation may come at a cost, with those working at larger businesses taking, on average, more sick days off per year compared to those working at an SME.

Dave expands: “Those working for bigger organisations tend to note salary and career progression as key benefits – both of which help toward talent retention. They are also more likely to have wellbeing benefits, however, a key part of keeping employees happy is looking at the overall context these perks are provided in —the culture of an organisation.

“Our research shows that those working at SMEs enjoy the fact that their company has a better workplace culture and a more tight-knit community within the business, something which is much harder for large companies to change and get right.

“There’s a David and Goliath battle for talent on the horizon where smaller businesses have a real opportunity to play to their strengths and use these qualities to attract and retain talent.

“For SMEs looking to attract top talent away from large businesses, prioritising company culture and bridging the benefits gap with small investments in key areas, like mental health support, could be the key to recovering and thriving in the post-Covid economy”, said Dave.

Prioritising people and perks

Due to limited resources, SMEs need to be smart when considering investments in their company – especially during financially testing times. When looking to bridge the gap between the perks of working for a larger organisation and an SME, businesses will need to invest strategically in benefits that meet employee expectations, deliver ROI and play to their strengths.

Dave adds: “We already know that wellbeing is strongly linked to workplace culture. Our previous research showed that 85 percent of people say there is a link between wellbeing and workplace culture, meaning investing in your people’s wellbeing has a strong, positive impact on your business.”

Capitalising on culture could be the strategic move businesses need to retain top talent and avoid heavy recruitment costs: more than half (64%) of employees say they would leave their job if the workplace culture did not fit.

“Knowing that people are satisfied at work but are still willing to leave is troubling for employers – especially SMEs that are already fighting against inflation and increasing costs.

“To avoid the potential exodus of workers and soaring hidden recruitment costs, businesses will need to prioritise the benefits that matter most to employees, such as creating a great culture through wellbeing support. Not only will it help with employee retention, but it will also make a lasting impact on employee health and performance, delivering tangible business benefits”, concludes Dave.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Caroline Essex: How the ‘Modern Workplaces’ consultation could affect working mums and surf bums

Proposed extension to maternity leave and paternity leave Any new...

Richard Nicolle: What does the Conservative victory mean for UK Employment Law over next 5 years?

A look at what the conservative government is proposing in the next five years regarding employment law and how this will affect workers and their families.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you