UK CEOs most unapproachable increasing disengagement

-

“When CEOs are disconnected from their workforce, employees can be left feeling disengaged”, UK CEOs are the most unapproachable and untrustworthy compared to other countries.

Research from Unit4, a software company’s report ‘Decision Making for the Future Business’, found that UK CEOs are more unapproachable than the world average, with 14 per cent of UK employees feel the top of their company is this way compared to 9 per cent worldwide. Unit4 also states that having disengaged staff can lead to lower productivity.

A tenth (10 per cent) feel their UK CEO is untrustworthy compared to a global average of 8 per cent, as well as 15 per cent believing their CEO is only motivated by money compared to a global average of 11 per cent.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Alarmingly, 5 per cent globally did not even know if their CEO was a man or woman.

Just under half (45 per cent) of UK managers think their CEO does not care about social issues. More than a third (38 per cent) of UK managers said their CEO does not lead the company with integrity and 37 per cent feel they have no vision for the company.

Also, 65 per cent of UK managers compared to a global average of 52 per cent feel their CEOs do not care about the opinion of employees.

Mike Ettling, CEO at Unit4, said:

Today we really have a new board member in companies across the world – the Chief Elusive Officer, the business leader who has not once engaged with their employees or sought to empower them to make decisions that impact the future of their organisation. This must change and it must change fast.”

When CEOs are disconnected from their workforce, employees can be left feeling disengaged which can lead to much lower productivity at work and ultimately impact the bottom-line. A rigid, hierarchical business structure is simply no longer suitable for today’s workforce and CEOs need to change in order to lead more effectively.

This old-fashioned management mindset is no longer fit for today’s business and must be rejected in order to encourage the best asset a company has; its people. Perhaps a way to enable that is through the better use of technology so that employees can feel more engaged and empowered to make those decisions.

Pete Eyre, managing director at Vevox said:

It is increasingly important for senior management to make employees feel valued and listened to at work and focus on building better relationships if they want to lead an engaged workforce. There is currently a clear engagement gap but, if businesses actively start introducing processes and systems that encourage inclusivity and directly address employee feedback and ideas, they stand a good chance at solving this.

If employees felt that management teams would listen to them and take their feedback seriously, many would feel much more confident in suggesting the new ideas they have to offer, whether that be anonymously or face-to-face. Organisations need to look at introducing new measures to enable them to listen and engage with their employees more positively and ensure every employee feels they have a voice within the business.

In order to collect this valuable feedback and show employees that they really are listening, organisations must provide channels that people feel safe using. Being able to offer anonymity is key to this as employees feel more comfortable knowing they don’t face the risk of judgement from bosses or peers. If businesses fail to provide these channels, employees will find other ways to express their feelings, some of which, i.e. through social media, can be public and therefore damaging to the business.

Unit4 conducted this research by speaking to 1,837 managers and non-managers from Canada, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK and the USA.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Nicola McQueen: Skills Shortage – why HR is not to blame?

The much-discussed ‘war for talent’ is continuing to hit the headlines this year as organisations across the UK bear the brunt of industry-wide skills shortages threatening their productivity and growth.

Dr Mark Winwood: Some employees will lie when they’re sick – but it’s not all dishonest

The first Monday of February has come to be known as ‘National Sickie Day’ – the day that employees are supposed to be most likely to call in sick. Employment law firm ELAS, which has promoted the notion, maintains that a combination of miserable weather, commuting in the dark, post-Christmas credit card bills and long gap between holidays makes the first Monday of February the day that people are most likely to take some unofficial time off.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you