Uber landmark case casts a shadow over gig economy

-

Employees of app-based taxi company Uber have won a groundbreaking case after employment tribunal judges ruled that they were not self-employed and should be paid the National Living Wage and be entitled to holiday pay.

The tribunal ruling also states the company must also pay national living wage with far-reaching implications for the gig economy and the app’s business model.

The case could open up the  firm to claims from all of its 40,000 drivers in the UK, and force other companies in the ‘gig economy’ to review the way that they are employing staff. It is likely that the firm will appeal against the finding.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The company had argued that the drivers were independent contractors who are self-employed and can choose where and when they work.

But an employment tribunal in London found that this was not the case. Nigel Mackay from the employment team at law firm Leigh Day which represented the drivers, said:

“We are pleased that the employment tribunal has agreed with our arguments that drivers are entitled to the most basic workers’ rights, including to be paid the national minimum wage and to receive paid holiday, which were previously denied to them

“This is a ground-breaking decision. It will impact not just on the thousands of Uber drivers working in this country, but on all workers in the so-called gig economy whose employers wrongly classify them as self-employed and deny them the rights to which they are entitled.”

Uber has more than 40,000 drivers in the UK who connect to people looking for a cab via a smartphone app. Currently they are all on contracts which describe them as self-employed contractors.

The legal action, which started over a year ago, was brought by the GMB trade union, which has more than 700,000 members, following claims that Uber had disregarded its drivers’ basic employment rights.

“This will have a hugely positive impact on over 30,000 drivers in London and across England and Wales and for thousands more in other industries where bogus self-employment is rife,” she continued.

The company has long championed its flexible offering to drivers, which does not require them to log in for a minimum number of hours or restrict them to working for Uber alone.

Sean Nesbitt, partner in the employment team at International law firm Taylor Wessing comments on how the decision will affect the wider gig economy:

[The decision] affects over 100,000 UK workers in related industries.  (Never mind the millions of other UK self-employed.)  While the judgment only applies to the 19 claimants in the specific case, Uber has a large and growing number of drivers, and there are a growing number of similar cases regarding the status of “workers” from other courier companies.  On 22 November 2016, one of four cases against courier companies begins in the same Central London Employment Tribunal which heard the Uber case.  Adding the 11,000 people engaging in those companies with the 8,000 Deliveroo and 10,500 Hermes couriers, there are nearly 70,000 in driving and courier industries.

 Third, policy makers are very interested in the gig economy, and this Judgment forms part of an important fact pattern that will set future policy. This goes beyond online: the Prime Minister has already appointed Matthew Taylor to produce a report on the implications of the gig economy, BEIS announced an inquiry on 26 October 2016 into the future world of work, HMRC is beefing up its enforcement unit and foster carers are already raising a challenge for worker status. Add health service work and the costs of these rights can significantly affect the State as a business partner – just as equal pay cases have.

 With conflicting data over the size and impact of the gig economy there is too much at stake for Government business, unions and the individuals who work in the gig economy for this to be anything other than the first in a series of battles.” 

 

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Mike Hibbs: Sick leave, keeping your processes healthy

Two million people could benefit from the proposed change to SSP.

Marcus Thornley: How to make sure recruits feel welcome when onboarding remotely

"Employees can’t hit the ground running if they’re nervous and anxious, so the ideal onboarding process will support the confidence of a new joiner."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you