Everyday email-drain leads to 20 percent loss in UK business productivity

-

Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan in romantic hit movie ‘You’ve Got Mail’ (1998)

Time wasted reading unnecessary emails you have been cc’d on has been identified by UK office workers as the single biggest disruption to workplace efficiency, according to new research from global printing solutions company Epson.

Everyday email-drain leads a number of workplace inefficiencies that UK employees believe are, collectively, causing a 20 percent loss in their total productivity.

 

The survey of over 1,000 UK workers found that existing workplace technology and its use are hitting daily productivity levels hard. More than half of respondents (53 percent) identified unnecessary emails as the most frequent disruption, followed by restrictions on being able to upgrade technology equipment (35 percent) and distractions caused by technology in meetings (27 percent).

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

“Individual employees are feeling a dual-hit of cultural and technology bad practice. And it’s often death by a thousand cuts: seemingly small things like the in-house printer not printing to a high enough quality, for example, is a frequent inefficiency for over a quarter of the workforce,”says Mark Reynolds, Business Director, Epson UK.

“The top-line twenty percent loss in productivity, meanwhile, effectively means you could have one extra person in every five to complete the same workload. Imagine what this could mean for the competitiveness of your organisation and the health of the UK’s business landscape.”

 

The implementation of new technology was recognised as a possible solution to improving productivity, yet there are still barriers to overcome. Three quarters (74 percent) of UK employees currently believe new technology acts as a greater productivity drain than generator when initially implemented. In fact, 11 percent believe it takes a year or longer for new tech to start enabling more productive ways of working.

 

“It’s almost pointless to invest in the latest and greatest technology, only to fall at the next hurdle; rolling-it out internally. To reach a situation where employees see new technology as a burden, rather than benefit, highlights the need for greater consideration when turning a new investment into a new resource that people can actually use,” continues Reynolds.

 

“This has long-since moved on from a concern limited to the IT department; technology today directly impacts every employee and should be on the agenda of the entire senior leadership team within an organisation, regardless of size or sector.”

The main barriers, identified by employees, prohibiting technology from benefiting the workplace include:

o   Poor training on how to use new technologies (37 percent)

o   Dealing with product downtime due to maintenance or consumables issues (23 percent)

o   The technology implemented is not suitable for the role or requirement (23 percent)

In addition, 71 percent of employees believe their organisation slips behind implementing the latest technology because of the cost of previous investment, and over half (53 percent) would rather see what their competitors do before implementing new technology.

The research was conducted online by FTI Consulting’s strategy, consulting and research team from 10 – 17 September 2014, with white collar workers in offices on location in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, in their local languages.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Amelia Brand: Is Elon Musk a leadership nightmare?

Is Time magazine’s 2021 ‘Person of the Year’ a narcissistic bully or a leader with unique style?

David Price: Are your employees suffering from Brexit anxiety?

Find out about the simple ways through which you can support anxious employees during  Brexit.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you