<

!Google ads have two elements of code. This is the 'header' code. There will be another short tag of code that is placed whereever you want the ads to appear. These tags are generated in the Google DFP ad manager. Go to Ad Units = Tags. If you update the code, you need to replace both elements.> <! Prime Home Page Banner (usually shows to right of logo) It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section*> <! 728x90_1_home_hrreview - This can be turned off if needed - it shows at the top of the content, but under the header menu. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section * > <! 728x90_2_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 1st or 2nd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! 728x90_3_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 2nd or 3rd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! Footer - 970x250_large_footerboard_hrreview. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section* > <! MPU1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section3* > <! MPU4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_3 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_5 are not currently being used - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Bombora simple version of script - not inlcuding Google Analytics code* >

Young people suffering high unemployment and falling incomes

-

shutterstock

The recession and its aftermath have been much harder on the young than the old. The employment rate of those in their 20s has fallen, while employment among older individuals has not; and real pay among young workers has fallen much faster than among older workers. As a result, young adults’ real incomes have fallen much more than any other age-group.

These are among the findings of a new report by IFS researchers, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and published today. The research uses data on household incomes from the government’s Households Below Average Income series, recently made available up to and including 2012–13, in conjunction with the Labour Force Survey.

Key findings on young adults and the recession include:

  • Between 2007–08 and 2012–13, real (RPI-adjusted) median household income fell by 13% among 22-30 year-olds. Among 31-59 year-olds, the fall was only 7%, and median income did not fall at all for those aged 60 and above.
  • This was driven by changes in earnings and employment levels. The employment rate for 22 to 30-year-olds fell by 4 percentage points (ppt), while remaining unchanged for 31 to 59-year-olds. Among those in work, real median pay (before tax) fell by 15% among 22-30 year-olds, and by 6% for 31 to 59-year-olds.
  • Just over one quarter of adults aged 22-30 live with their parents. This has cushioned the impact of the recession on their household incomes: comparing 2005–06 to 2007–08 with 2010–11 to 2012–13, median household income for those living with parents fell by 8%; without their parents’ incomes, the fall would have been 17%.
  • Young adults have actually seen the sharpest falls in housing costs. Young home-owners have benefited most from lower mortgage interest rates, because they have the most mortgage debt; and recent real-terms falls in private sector rents helped young adults the most, because they are the more likely to rent from a private (rather than social) landlord.
  • But the rapid decline in home-ownership across generations continues. The homeownership rate for 25 year-olds has halved in 20 years: 21% of those born in the mid 1980s owned a home at this age, compared with 34% of the mid-1970s cohort and 45% of the mid-1960s cohort.

Looking across the population as a whole:

  • The official measure shows real (RPI-adjusted) median household income broadly stable between 2011–12 and 2012–13 (the latest year of data), but still 5.8% below its 2009–10 peak. If instead we use the improved RPIJ measure of inflation the picture is slightly less bleak, with real median income 3.6% lower than in 2009–10.
  • Real income falls since the start of the recession would have been larger were it not for lower housing costs. Between 2007–08 and 2012–13, average housing costs fell by nearly 20% relative to other prices, pushing down inflation. This was driven by large falls in interest rates: real housing costs for mortgage-paying owner-occupiers fell by 37% – and from 18% to 13% as a fraction of their income.
  • The recession has had differing impacts across the UK. Comparing 2007–08 to 2009–10 with 2010–11 to 2012–13, real falls in median income range from 8% in Northern Ireland to 2% in the East Midlands. After deducting housing costs from income, London saw the joint-biggest falls (with Northern Ireland). There is no clear relationship across the country between pre-crisis income levels and income changes since the crisis (and in particular no clear North-South divide).

Incomes have changed differently across the population:

  • Income inequality remained significantly lower than before the recession, though barely changed in 2012–13. The widely-used Gini coefficient measure of inequality was no higher in 2012–13 than in 1990.
  • Median income for non-working households (including pensioners) was 60% of median income for working households in 2007–08, but 67% by 2012–13. This is because workers’ pay fell while benefit entitlements were relatively stable. Two-fifths of the fall in inequality over this period can be attributed to a closing of the gap between households with someone in work and the rest of the population.

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

Richard Evens: The impact of the workplace environment on productivity and performance

Employees are the most important aspect of any organisation...

Marcus Beaver: Work Perks – How COVID-19 has changed benefit strategies

"There’s been a huge shift away from office-centric benefits to more offerings around flexible hours, utility contributions, and technologies."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Exit mobile version