HR do not provide leaders with recruitment data whilst making hiring decisions

-

More than two-thirds of talent acquisition and HR professionals do not provide senior leaders with the recruitment data to make the best decisions when hiring new employees.

This research comes from Aptitude Research, who provides research, advisory and market analysis on human capital management (HCM) and Oleeo, a company that assists other businesses in making the best recruitment decisions, who found that 67 per cent of talent acquisition and HR do not pass on recruitment data to senior leaders when making hiring decisions.

Less than a third (32 per cent) of senior decision-makers feel confident with the amount of data they have available to them when deciding who to hire. This is despite 63 per cent of businesses believing that “identifying and attracting quality hires is the greatest challenge they face.”

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

As well as companies agreeing that the use of quality data whilst making recruitment decisions leads to the chances of hiring a strong candidate to be twice as likely.

Nearly three-quarters (72 per cent) are now prioritising automated recruitment decisions for the year ahead. Still, only 27 per cent of organisations are planning to automate more than 50 per cent of their talent acquisition processes.

The research points to the use of Recruiting Enablement technology as a way to reduce the amount of bias in recruitment decisions as well as streamlining recruiter’s administrative burden by automating the process of making a schedule for when to interview, call and search for candidates.

Charles Hipps, CEO and founder at Oleeo, said:

The report clearly shows that the use of data is critical if businesses want to find, engage and attract this very best talent. Worryingly, decision makers are either not confident in the data they have, or they are being supplied with inaccurate information which jeopardizes their ability to meet the fundamental recruitment challenge their business faces. Through a greater understanding of the data, more control over what touch points are measured, knowing what attributes a ‘top applicant’ has, and the use of Recruiting Enablement, businesses can still fight for the highest quality candidates.

This research-based report highlights the critical need for Recruiting Enablement to deliver improvements such as overall efficiency, candidate experience, reduced bias, and quality of hires. It takes the guesswork out of talent acquisition and allows companies to use data and insights to drive success. Hiring the very best talent is something that all businesses are striving to do, and armed with the top-notch data which Recruitment Enablement delivers, recruiters and HR teams will be twice as effective at finding, engaging and keeping the very best talent. It’s a no-brainer.

Madeline Laurano, the founder of Aptitude Research, said:

Companies are facing intense pressure to more accurately identify and measure quality of hire. While quality of hire is certainly not a new concern, the responsibility has shifted from hiring managers to HR and talent acquisition leaders. As a result, talent acquisition leaders are being held accountable for what happens beyond when a candidate accepts an offer. Candidates often make a decision to join an employer solely on their interaction with a recruiting team during the talent acquisition process. If the recruiting process is automated, it gives candidates a more consistent and meaningful experience.

This research was conducted by speaking to talent acquisition directors and HR professionals worldwide of companies ranging from 250 to over 10,000 employees.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

NHS badge review raises wider questions about political expression at work

A government-backed NHS review has reignited debate over political symbols at work and how employers can balance protected beliefs with workplace conduct.

Andrew Fettes-Brown: Leading with curiosity – why the built environment needs a culture shift to allow for innovation

Curiosity creates the conditions for learning, growth and understanding. It encourages us to interrogate problems properly rather than rushing to solutions.

Mental health ‘stigma’ still stops staff speaking to managers

Most employees remain uncomfortable discussing mental health concerns with managers despite growing workplace wellbeing investment.

UK set for biggest rise in unemployment among G7 nations, OECD warns

Britain is forecast to record the largest rise in unemployment among G7 economies this year as economic growth slows and labour market conditions weaken.
- Advertisement -

UK employers ‘risk falling behind global rivals on AI hiring’

UK employers remain cautious about artificial intelligence in recruitment while overseas rivals move faster to adopt AI hiring tools.

Carly Jenner of Apeel Sciences

A global people leader shares how list-making, wellness routines and international teamwork shape her working day in HR.

Must read

Naomi Greenwood: What employers must do to combat sexual misconduct

Naomi Greenwood, partner in the employment team at Southeast law firm Moore Barlow, explains why addressing sexual misconduct allegations head-on is always the best approach for businesses.

Jason Brannan: The new wave – rise of the Employee Relations Officer

Everyone has heard of Human Resources, it’s a job role we’re all familiar with. In the past, this role revolved around policy and process, rather than getting involved deeper into the business itself.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you