Big Four accounting firms slash graduate hiring as AI takes on junior tasks

-

Figures show that all four firms have significantly reduced their intake of junior talent over the past year. KPMG made the steepest cut, reducing its graduate and school leaver recruitment by 29 percent from 1,399 in 2023 to 942. It expects to hire around 1,000 in 2024.

Deloitte’s intake dropped by 18 percent, from 1,700 to 1,400, with no expected growth this year. EY reduced graduate hiring by 11 percent to 1,600, while PwC trimmed its intake by 6 percent to 1,500.

Slashing graduate jobs ‘could be a misstep’

The cuts are being attributed in part to the integration of AI tools, which are now performing many of the administrative and repetitive tasks traditionally handled by junior hires. However, some in the HR sector are warning that reducing graduate opportunities may be a strategic error.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Ronni Zehavi, CEO and Co-Founder of HR technology provider HiBob, told HR review, “The Big Four’s decision to slash graduate jobs could be a misstep. The claim that AI will replace half of entry-level white-collar jobs is more likely based on speculation than reality. While AI is certainly changing how we work—particularly in automating repetitive tasks—the idea of widespread replacement is greatly exaggerated.”

Zehavi argued that junior roles remain vital to business, offering new employees an opportunity to gain experience, develop soft skills and learn how to work alongside technology.

“Entry-level roles are evolving, yes – but they’re not disappearing. Instead, they’ll be shaped by new criteria, with greater emphasis on digital fluency, soft skills and the ability to work with AI rather than be replaced by it.”

HiBob research supports this perspective. According to the company, 73 percent of HR leaders say they have been able to hire graduates directly into more senior roles due to AI automating routine work. The result is that junior staff can take on strategic tasks earlier in their careers, accelerating development and potentially shortening the time they spend in entry-level positions.

AI adoption requires oversight and training

Zehavi also said that AI still requires human oversight and argued that effective use of the technology will come from those who are properly trained.

“To alleviate AI fears, HR leaders need to empower employees to leverage the tech. As threats of AI taking jobs persist, many remain too afraid to explore AI and how it could benefit their jobs and careers. HR teams need to be AI champions in the workplace, providing training aligned to employee skills gaps and business needs.”

The potential downside of premature decisions to cut staff was noted in recent findings from Orgvue, an organisational design and planning software provider. Based on research with 1,000 senior leaders, more than half (55%) of businesses that made redundancies following AI deployment later said those decisions were poorly planned.

Zehavi added, “The businesses empowering employees with AI skills will outpace those making mass redundancies. AI doesn’t replace people; it allows them to do more.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Sandra Porter: Has HR forgotten to put its own oxygen mask on first?

The HR profession is on the brink of well-deserved greatness, writes Sandra Porter.  From the Covid-19 cloud there is the potential silver lining of a permanent seat in organisations’ ‘war rooms’.

Jean Kelly: How to investigate harassment and bullying complaints robustly- Part 4

For sound and effective formal investigations of harassment, bullying...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you