Few employers prepared for talent challenges from expected surge in work automation

-

Willis Towers Watson survey reveals work being done by automation will nearly double in next three years

Automation in the workplace, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, is expected to surge in the next three years, according to a survey by Willis Towers Watson, a leading global advisory, broking and solutions company. However, the survey revealed very few companies and HR functions are fully prepared to address the organisational change requirements related to automation as well as less reliance on full-time employees and greater reliance on contingent talent.

The Global Future of Work Survey found that companies expect automation will account for on average 22 per cent of work being done in the next three years. That compares with 12 per cent of work companies say is being done using AI and robotics today, and just 7 per cent three years ago.

“UK companies clearly see work automation gaining momentum, with little signs of slowing down anytime soon,” said George Zarkadakis, Digital Lead for Willis Towers Watson’s Talent and Rewards practice. “The implications for HR and talent strategies are immediate. On one hand, the growing use of AI, robotics, free agent workers, contractors, consultants and part-time employees brings with it HR challenges that only few organisations are prepared to tackle. On the other hand, many companies recognise the need for breakthrough and innovative approaches — and are reinventing work and how talent and skills combine.”

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Indeed, according to the survey, less than7 per cent say their HR functions are fully prepared for the changing requirements of digitalisation, although on average, fewer than a third are somewhat prepared and have already taken some action to prepare for the future. For example, 31 per cent of companies have taken steps to address talent deficits through workforce planning and actions while 32 per cent of companies have taken action to identify the emerging skills required for their business; 29 per cent have taken action to match talent to the new work requirements, and 27 per cent have taken action to enable careers based on a more agile and flattened organisation structure.

Additionally, many respondents are either planning to take action this year or considering measures to prepare for the future, such as deconstructing jobs and identifying which tasks can be automated (50 per cent) and identifying reskilling pathways for talent whose work is being subsumed by automation (48 per cent). Employers are also taking action to identify “skill and will” gaps as automation changes skill premiums (50 per cent), and reconfigure total rewards and benefits to fit a radically different workforce (53 per cent).

In a reminder of the complexities associated with automation, the survey discovered some interesting dichotomies. For example, the percentage of employers automating work and seeing an increase in skill requirements is expected to rise sharply from 27 per cent currently to 45 per cent in the next three years. Conversely, over a third (42 per cent) expect to apply automation and redesign jobs to lower skill requirements over the next three years. The impact of automation on the utilisation of non-employee talent is also noteworthy. While 19 per cent of respondents say automation currently enables or requires them to use more non-employee talent, such as free agents or contractors, 50 per cent expect that to be the case in the next three years. Almost half of employers (49 per cent) believe they will require fewer employees in the next three years as a result of automation compared with 27 per cent of organisations that say that is true today.

George Zarkadakis said:

“Most companies believe automation will have a significant impact on leaders and managers in the next three years,” . This is underscored by the percentage of companies that say automation will change how managers educate workers on the impact of automation on their jobs in the next three years (32 per cent this year versus 61 per cent in 2020). Additionally, almost two-thirds (63 per cent) say leaders will need to think differently about the requirements and skills for successors and succession management as a result of automation.

“Management and leadership development will be a critical issue for companies of all sizes over the next three years. We know strong leadership is a key driver of employee engagement and retention. But in the face of rapidly changing work automation, companies will need to develop leaders and managers who can orchestrate a radically different work ecosystem while keeping all of the talent in their workplaces fully engaged,”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Arran Heal: How to avoid tribunals

At the core of the problem is how HR deal with workplace relationship issues, and even more fundamentally, the culture of how people deal with difficult conversations.

Chelsea Feeney: Supreme Court decision for Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers – implications for employers

On Wednesday 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers. What does it mean?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you