Half of UK employees want this sustainable workplace benefit

-

Nearly half of UK employees are calling for the introduction of Salary Sacrifice schemes to access electric vehicles (EVs), according to new research by Volkswagen Financial Services (VWFS) Fleet.

Despite this growing demand, only 32 percent of businesses currently offer this eco-friendly benefit, highlighting a significant gap between employer offerings and employee expectations.

The study, which surveyed 2,000 employed adults across the UK, found that 48 percent of workers would like their employers to provide a Salary Sacrifice car scheme—where employees can allocate a portion of their pre-tax salary toward the cost of a new vehicle.

This tax-efficient scheme is not only popular for its financial benefits but also for its contribution to reducing personal carbon footprints, a key consideration for many workers today.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Salary Sacrifice schemes offer employees an affordable way to access a brand-new vehicle, with no upfront costs, early termination fees, or hidden expenses,” said Dan Wright, Product Manager at VWFS Fleet. “The scheme also covers additional vehicle costs, such as insurance, maintenance, and breakdown cover, making it a highly attractive benefit with minimal cost to employers.”

Environmental responsibility

As businesses grapple with sustainability goals and the increasing importance of environmental responsibility, the study underscores the potential of Salary Sacrifice schemes to drive both talent attraction and retention. With 79 percent of employees expressing that it is important for their employers to take proactive steps toward sustainability, offering such benefits could become a key differentiator in a competitive job market.

Younger generations, in particular, are leading the charge, with research by Deloitte showing that 55 percent of Gen Z and Millennial workers consider a company’s environmental impact before accepting a job. Moreover, over 40 percent have either changed jobs or plan to do so due to concerns over sustainability.

One-third (33%) of respondents in the VWFS Fleet survey identified Salary Sacrifice as the most attractive eco-friendly workplace benefit, second only to remote working options, which 48 percent favoured. Additionally, 75 percent of employees expressed a desire to reduce the emissions associated with their daily commutes, with 67 percent recognising the role of Salary Sacrifice in providing affordable access to EVs.

“Salary Sacrifice schemes are crucial in encouraging EV adoption through favorable tax incentives,” Wright added. “With the Benefit-in-Kind (BiK) rate for EVs currently set at just 2 percent—and only rising by 1 percent each year until 2028—this is a significant saving compared to the potential BiK rates for petrol or diesel vehicles, which could exceed 30 percent by then.”

As businesses face ongoing challenges in recruiting and retaining top talent, VWFS Fleet’s research highlights the critical opportunity for employers to enhance their benefits packages with sustainable options. “There is a clear demand from employees for eco-friendly benefits, and Salary Sacrifice schemes offer a cost-effective way for businesses to meet this demand while advancing their own sustainability objectives,” Wright concluded.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Neil Pickering: Generational tensions – The Ageing Workforce vs. Generation Y

It was interesting to read KPMG’s recent report which...

Kate Palmer: Should Ethnicity Pay Gap Reporting be introduced?

The Liberal Democrats have called on employers to report on their ethnicity pay gap announcing that they want to hold the government to account on their inaction.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you