1 in 10 believe AI will be highly detrimental in the workplace

-

A recent global survey by the Peninsula Group has revealed that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are divided in their views on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace.

While one in three businesses believe AI has the potential to positively transform their operations, 1 in 10 fear it could be highly detrimental.

The survey, which polled 79,000 businesses across Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the UK, highlighted both the opportunities and concerns that employers face regarding AI adoption. Despite a 50 percent year-on-year increase in AI usage, only 1 in 10 SMEs report regular use of the technology.

Regional differences were also noted, with Australian and New Zealand businesses leading in AI adoption, while Irish employers were the least likely to integrate AI into their operations.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

As AI adoption rises, so do concerns. Nearly half of those surveyed expressed worries about the security risks associated with AI—a 60 percent increase compared to last year. Security remains the top concern, with 47 percent of respondents citing it as their primary issue. Other significant concerns included the potential for reputational damage (+183%), legal risks (+183%), loss of intellectual property (+178%), and impacts on work quality and productivity (+158%).

Interestingly, the survey found a 6 percent decrease in the number of businesses that believe AI could transform workplaces, alongside a 19 percent increase in those who view AI as a useful tool that won’t replace traditional methods. Additionally, there was a 21 percent rise in employers expressing fear of the unknown regarding AI.

Among businesses that have integrated AI, most are using it for administrative tasks or creative writing. However, the survey revealed growing concerns over AI’s impact on jobs and intellectual property. For example, one in four UK SMEs now worry about losing intellectual property due to AI, a significant jump from 1 in 20 last year.

Other notable findings include:

  • Less than half of small businesses believe people are irreplaceable in their operations.
  • One in four SMEs anticipate that AI will eventually reduce their workforce.
  • Canadian employers remain the most cautious, with only 23 percent believing in AI’s transformative potential. Over half are either fearful, uncertain, or believe AI could be detrimental to the workplace.
  • Australian employers are twice as concerned about intellectual property loss compared to their Irish and UK counterparts, and three times more than Canadian businesses.
  • 40 percent of UK SMEs are worried about AI’s margin of error, up from 14 percent last year.
  • One in five UK small businesses using AI report a positive impact.

Peninsula Group Chief Operations Officer, Alan Price, commented on the findings: “AI continues to dominate headlines, but it’s clear that businesses are still uncertain about the balance between its risks and potential. As usage increases, so do the concerns. This shows there is still considerable work to be done to reassure SMEs globally.”

Price highlighted the need for more robust safeguards and clarity around AI’s impact on security, productivity, and intellectual property. He also noted concerns about the premature integration of AI, unconscious bias in technology, and the risks associated with AI being “as good as the person programming it.”

“Overall, it appears small business owners recognise AI’s potential but remain cautious about its implications for jobs, traditional working methods, and workforce engagement. While many are not opposed to AI, they are seeking more assurance on security and output quality before fully embracing it,” Price concluded.

The survey underscores the ongoing debate within the SME community regarding AI’s role in the future of work, with many businesses weighing its potential benefits against significant risks.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Helen Tucker: Mental Health in the Workplace – how companies can act in 2017

As the days get shorter and temperatures drop, October...

Angela Everitt: Company culture and its role in employee engagement

In February this year, I was part of a...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you