Equal pay court victory could leave employers exposed

-

The Birmingham council workers’ recent victory means workers now have six-years to make an equal pay claim in the high court. In other words, they are not limited to making such a claim within a six-month window to an employment tribunal, which Birmingham Council were arguing should be the case under its interpretation of existing legislation.

As women make up more than half the UK workforce, and previous EU surveys have shown the country as having one of the highest pay gaps between men and women, will this open the floodgates to other claims going back six years, especially in traditionally male dominated industries? What actually amounts to “pay” for the purposes of a claim being made? And what may be on most people’s minds is how they actually find out if they are being paid less than their gender counterparts?

Laws on equal pay have existed for more than 40 years, and the latest legislation is in the Equality Act 2010. The act requires that, where men and women are employed on equal work, the terms of their contracts should also be equal, including pay. This law applies where there are differences in equality of terms between men and women, but does not apply to those persons of the same sex.

For the purposes of the act, “equality of terms” includes contractual pay, but can also embrace other terms and conditions of employment such as the provision of a company car, healthcare and other benefits – therefore, a differential of any such terms can give rise to a claim.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If you think you have been paid less than a gender counterpart, how do you find out what they are earning and how would this best be tackled with your employer? As a starting point, you need to establish who exactly you are comparing yourself with of the opposite sex.

That person should be employed on “like work”, “work related as equivalent” or “work of an equal value” basis. This person then becomes your “comparator” and must be in the “same employment” as you, meaning it must be with your employer or an associated employer.

Once you establish who your comparator is, you are entitled under the act to ask your colleagues about their pay in order to establish whether there are inequalities. However, there is no obligation on your colleague to respond and you cannot be penalised by your employer for having such discussions.

In addition, under section 138 of the act there is a questionnaire you can send to your employer to seek further information in relation your concerns about unequal pay. This is to establish whether your employer agrees with your assertion of carrying out the same role as the opposite sex, confirmation of what the pay differential amounts to, and whether there is a “material defence” to such differentials.

The types of “material defence” that could be raised by an employer include geographic locations or market forces necessitating the need to retain employees carrying out particular roles at a higher salary. An employer must show that all the differences are attributable to the reasons they provide.

As always, it is often best to approach your employer on an informal basis to see if matters can be resolved. If proceedings are ultimately necessary, you can either bring a claim in an employment tribunal at any time while you are still employed, or within six months of leaving your job.

Alternatively, after yesterday’s judgement you have six years to bring a claim in the high court, although it was specified that claims should be brought in the employment tribunal where it is still possible to do so. The fact you now also have a longer time period does, however, leave your employer exposed. Whether this will lead to a rush of historic claims remains to be seen

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Lucinda Bromfield: Tis the season to be sued…

Christmas is officially over, decorations are now safely packed...

Mini Setty: Regional race to secure sponsor licenses

"To simplify processes come January and avoid a skills shortage, regional employers should initiate their sponsor license applications now."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you