Employment law reforms ‘a licence to treat people badly’

-

The government’s recently announced reforms to employment laws have been labelled a licence for employers “to treat people badly” by a leading legal expert.

Last week, business secretary Vince Cable announced that the government is to adopt several reforms proposed by venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft in a report published in May.

These include a cap on the amount of compensation employees can receive for unfair dismissals and the introduction of fees for taking employment disputes to tribunal.

While some have claimed the reforms could help remove employers’ fear of litigation and encourage them to take on new staff, others say they represent a serious erosion of employee rights.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Writing in the Guardian this week, Anya Palmer, a barrister specialising in employment law at Old Square Chambers, argued the reforms give employers scope to mistreat staff and could possibly lead to workplace discrimination going unpunished.

“It’s a licence to treat people badly and still pay less,” she commented.

Ms Palmer noted that the cap on compensation would affect lower paid workers in particular, with the proposal being to reduce the maximum compensatory award from its current level of £72,300 down to median pay (£26,000) or one year’s salary, whichever is lower.

“So the cap on compensation would be slashed by two thirds, more for low earners, because half of all workers earn less than £26,000. For someone who earns only £15,000, the cap would be £15,000.”

However, fees for taking an unfair dismissal claim to tribunal could have an even bigger impact by deterring staff from challenging their employers even in genuine cases of discrimination.

“For bigger claims such as unfair dismissal or discrimination the total fees will be £1,200,” she said.

“There can be no doubt the aim is to deter claims, and the fees will undoubtedly present an insurmountable hurdle for many claimants.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

A Pragmatic Approach To Supporting Learning

In 2006 Charles Jennings, Global Head of Learning at Reuters, talked about the ‘conspiracy of convenience’ that exists between managers and training departments. Barry Sampson, Learning Support Manager, B&Q discusses what he meant...

Friday the 13th a superstition? For many businesses it’s a money losing reality

If there is any truth in the old Friday the 13th superstition, it's probably best left to the mystics, astrologers and soothsayers to debate, although this current Friday the 13th is apparently much more doom laden than Fridays past, because it is the third Friday the 13th of the year. This significantly increases the chances or misfortune....because, well, I'm not really sure.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you