Demand grows for McDonald’s to close franchises over abuse claims

-

Calls have been made for McDonald’s to sever franchise agreements with branches that violate labour laws, according to statements from the chair of the Business and Trade Committee.

MP Darren Jones expressed deep concern over distressing reports of sexual assault, harassment, racism, and bullying levelled against current and former staff at the UK outlets of the fast-food chain. The allegations included disturbing incidents of groping and harassment, involving workers as young as 17.

McDonald’s offered a profound apology and acknowledged its failure to meet expected standards.

In light of a BBC investigation into McDonald’s working conditions initiated in February, the company, under a legally binding agreement with the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), had pledged to prevent staff from experiencing sexual harassment.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite the company’s initial claim of a strong record in this regard, the investigation uncovered over 100 allegations of sexual assault, harassment, racism, and homophobia lodged by McDonald’s employees within the last five months.

The allegations have prompted significant concern, including from Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s spokesperson, who labelled them deeply troubling. Most employees at McDonald’s are not directly employed by the company; rather, the franchise model is used, allowing individual operators to manage the outlets and hire staff.

Are employment laws being upheld?

Darren Jones, a Labour MP, questioned the extent to which employment laws were being upheld within McDonald’s franchises and whether these commitments were included in the contracts with local restaurants.

He compared McDonald’s thoroughness in assessing burger quality and marketing standards to its potential negligence in ensuring fair and lawful treatment of employees. McDonald’s has maintained that its franchisees are required to adhere to UK law and that non-compliance can result in termination of their agreements.

The claims have been condemned

McDonald’s, a prominent private-sector employer in the UK, with a workforce of over 170,000 in 1,450 restaurants, has faced criticism for the alleged misconduct by managers at various locations. Workers have spoken out about incidents of harassment and assault, with some describing an environment where such behaviour was expected. The claims have been widely condemned by public figures, including Caroline Nokes, chair of the Women and Equalities Select Committee, who condemned the exploitation of young workers by older managers.

To address the issue of workplace harassment, Alistair Macrow, CEO of McDonald’s UK & Ireland, cited ongoing awareness training for managers and the implementation of new protective measures. However, MP Darren Jones insisted that the company must take responsibility to ensure such abuses are not perpetuated under its watch. The call for McDonald’s to take stronger action in franchise oversight and employee protection continues to resonate.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Lucinda Bromfield: Should we compromise?

For years, compromise agreements have been used to end...

Paul Burrin: Goodbye annual appraisals, hello continuous performance management

Why are companies looking backwards at past performance when they should be planning how the employee can excel (and be happier and more fulfilled) in the future? Paul Burrin explores.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you