College employee awarded £30k for unfair dismissal after redundancy process breach

-

Paul Richter, who had worked at Prior Pursglove College in Guisborough for 26 years, brought a claim against Atomix Educational Trust (formerly Tees Valley Collaborative Trust) following his redundancy last September. The tribunal upheld his claim of unfair dismissal and ordered the trust to pay £30,723.

Mr Richter had been employed as a liaison manager, supporting students with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), managing staff and providing teaching cover. He was made redundant following a restructure led by CEO Dr Nichole Munro, which aimed to separate teaching and support roles to improve competitiveness across the trust.

As part of the restructure, Mr Richter applied for a newly created deputy head role in a SEND team, known as Endeavour. The tribunal found that Mr Richter possessed “the experience, skills and capabilities in abundance” to perform the duties. However, he did not hold a professional teaching qualification, which was listed as essential for the role.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Offer of lower-paid role and pay protection oversight

Following a meeting with Dr Munro and HR lead Sharon Boyes in June 2023, Mr Richter was told he would not be considered for the deputy head position. Instead, he was offered an alternative role as student liaison lead across Prior Pursglove and Stockton Sixth Form College. The post did not include teaching or management responsibilities and came with a £4,953 pay reduction.

Mr Richter declined the offer, citing the demotion and reduced salary. He then appealed his dismissal internally, but this was unsuccessful. During the tribunal, it was revealed that the trust failed to inform him of an existing pay protection policy, which would have preserved his original salary for a period following redeployment.

Dr Munro explained that she had chosen not to offer pay protection in order to benchmark all roles, expressing concern that offering the benefit to one employee could lead to expectations from others. She acknowledged, however, that there was no legal barrier to increasing the pay of a redeployed role to match a previous salary.

The tribunal accepted Mr Richter’s evidence that he would have taken the student liaison lead position had pay protection been applied. Employment Judge JS Burns found that the trust’s failure to apply its own policy constituted a breach and said the employer had “kept quiet” about the benefit.

Tribunal findings and compensation

Judge Burns stated, “The failure to offer pay protection was a clear breach of the policy. If the respondent wanted to benchmark roles or do anything else contrary to its obligation under the pay protection policy, then it should have changed the policy first after proper consultation.

“I find that the respondent acted unfairly in withholding pay protection from the claimant, thereby breaching its obligation to take such steps as were reasonable to avoid or minimise redundancy by redeployment within its own organisation, and that this fell outside the range of reasonable responses available to an employer in the circumstances.”

Mr Richter, who represented himself during the proceedings, had also received a redundancy payment from the trust. The tribunal awarded him additional compensation, including £6,744 in pension contributions lost as a result of the dismissal. Judge Burns found it was “just and equitable” to award compensation equal to one year’s pay protection from September 2023, based on Mr Richter’s previous salary.

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Chris Welford: Derailment

Derailment is an interesting word, conjuring up images of...

The gig economy – what’s next for workers rights?

A popular definition of the gig economy is that it is "a labour market characterised by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work, as opposed to permanent jobs". But what is next for gig economy working rights?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you