Poor take up of paternity leave due to lack of support from employers

-

Cultural barriers in the workplace are impeding the uptake of paternity leave, according to research published by the Institute of Leadership & Management (ILM) today. The report warns that plans for shared parental leave will have little impact if ingrained attitudes towards paternity and maternity leave are not addressed.

According to the study of 1,000 employees and almost 800 managers, fewer than 10% of new fathers take more than two weeks of paternity leave, falling to 2% among managers, who feel greater pressure to return to work. A quarter of new fathers take no paternity leave whatsoever on the birth or adoption of a child.

A perceived lack of support from employers was revealed as a major factor limiting the uptake of paternity leave. Employees felt their organisations were less supportive of men taking two weeks of paternity leave (58%) than of mothers taking up to a full year of maternity leave (63%), leading to fewer men taking time out from the office after the birth of a child.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Charles Elvin, Chief Executive of the Institute of Leadership & Management, comments: “The introduction of shared parental leave is a crucial step towards enabling more women to progress into senior roles, yet our research revealed cultural barriers are impeding the uptake of both two weeks statutory paternity leave and Additional Paternity Leave. These attitudes pose a real challenge to the widespread acceptance of shared parental leave in 2015.”

Low levels of paternity pay are also impacting on the numbers of new fathers taking parental leave. While 70% of new mothers on maternity leave receive full pay between 1 and 38 weeks, just 9% of fathers receive anything longer than two weeks at full pay. This inconsistency in maternity and paternity pay is an active financial disincentive for new fathers to take either the two weeks statutory paternity leave or longer periods of Additional Paternity Leave, with new mothers far more likely to have their pay ‘topped up’ by their employer.

Charles Elvin continues: “This paternity pay gap not only creates practical financial barriers to shared parental leave, it also reinforces a cultural expectation within organisations that women will be the ones taking extended periods away from the workplace, which may halt their career progression. The new shared leave proposals create a real opportunity for employers to address these issues around enhanced pay and retain the flow of female talent into senior roles.”

While employees are widely supportive (84%) of shared leave, a much lower number (37%) think their employer is supportive of the changes, and one in five say their organisation is actively opposed to new fathers sharing leave with their partner.

This may, in part be due to concerns over the level of disruption caused by parental leave, with over half (58%) of managers describing it as disruptive to their team or organisation, and 16% describing it as very disruptive. SMEs were most affected by parental leave across the board and in most need of increased support and advice on introducing the new shared leave proposals.

Charles Elvin continues: “The implementation of forthcoming shared leave proposals will clearly pose some practical challenges for managers and employers, particularly those in smaller businesses. Supporting and training managers to plan more thoroughly for these situations and lead teams through periods of change will help minimise any disruption.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Collin Burry: How design can improve workplace health

Manage stress by creating break-out zones.

Faye Holland: Employee Engagement – Rhetoric or reality?

There’s no denying that the phrase ‘employee engagement’ is...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you